Guest adman77 Posted December 5, 2006 Posted December 5, 2006 (1,185) Acetyl*seryl*tyrosyl*seryl*iso*leucyl*threonyl*seryl*prolyl*seryl*glutaminyl*phenyl*alanyl*valyl*phenyl*alanyl*leucyl*seryl*seryl*valyl*tryptophyl*alanyl*aspartyl*prolyl*isoleucyl*glutamyl*leucyl*leucyl*asparaginyl*valyl*cysteinyl*threonyl*seryl*seryl*leucyl*glycyl*asparaginyl*glutaminyl*phenyl*alanyl*glutaminyl*threonyl*glutaminyl*glutaminyl*alanyl*arginyl*threonyl*threonyl*glutaminyl*valyl*glutaminyl*glutaminyl*phenyl*alanyl*seryl*glutaminyl*valyl*tryptophyl*lysyl*prolyl*phenyl*alanyl*prolyl*glutaminyl*seryl*threonyl*valyl*arginyl*phenyl*alanyl*prolyl*glycyl*aspartyl*valyl*tyrosyl*lysyl*valyl*tyrosyl*arginyl*tyrosyl*asparaginyl*alanyl*valyl*leucyl*aspartyl*prolyl*leucyl*isoleucyl*threonyl*alanyl*leucyl*leucyl*glycyl*threonyl*phenyl*alanyl*aspartyl*threonyl*arginyl*asparaginyl*arginyl*isoleucyl*isoleucyl*glutamyl*valyl*glutamyl*asparaginyl*glutaminyl*glutaminyl*seryl*prolyl*threonyl*threonyl*alanyl*glutamyl*threonyl*leucyl*aspartyl*alanyl*threonyl*arginyl*arginyl*valyl*aspartyl*aspartyl*alanyl*threonyl*valyl*alanyl*isoleucyl*arginyl*seryl*alanyl*asparaginyl*isoleucyl*asparaginyl*leucyl*valyl*asparaginyl*glutamyl*leucyl*valyl*arginyl*glycyl*threonyl*glycyl*leucyl*tyrosyl*asparaginyl*glutaminyl*asparaginyl*threonyl*phenyl*alanyl*glutamyl*seryl*methionyl*seryl*glycyl*leucyl*valyl*tryptophyl*threonyl*seryl*alanyl*prolyl*alanyl*serine
ecoli Posted December 5, 2006 Posted December 5, 2006 technically, theoretical molecules can give you longer words than even that.
insane_alien Posted December 5, 2006 Posted December 5, 2006 who needs theoretical, the IUPAC name of human DNA would fill several libraries.
TOAWNIF Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 In my experience the longest word is Why? :mad:
ecoli Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 In my experience the longest word is Why? :mad: gloriously philosophical.
RyanJ Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 who needs theoretical, the IUPAC name of human DNA would fill several libraries. That would be interesting too see; one for every person on the planet would be a hell of a lot of books! They can't even agree on a name for a semi-complex compound so they have little hope of ever getting a name (nor would they want too I hope!)
insane_alien Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 well, this is where digital storage comes into its own. when you can shove a couple of libraries in a surprisingly small box.
RyanJ Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 well, this is where digital storage comes into its own. when you can shove a couple of libraries in a surprisingly small box. Good point (with those new HDD disks in the making we are talking serious storage in a really small place already). Could it be named by hand? No. Do we have the processing power capable of naming a full DNA strand? Probably but who would waste their time? Still, I'd love to see it
insane_alien Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 scrolling through it would probably take a few years in itself.
RyanJ Posted December 6, 2006 Posted December 6, 2006 Probably and I'd also like to find someone that could say the thing! Now that would be a feat worthy of recognition.
insane_alien Posted December 7, 2006 Posted December 7, 2006 it could be the new memorizing pi to the nth number fad. who can remember their own DNA sequence to the most base pairs.
Sequence Posted December 8, 2006 Posted December 8, 2006 GTCAGTCAGTCGTGTAGTCGATGCTAGCTACGTAGTAGCTACGTACGTAGCTACGTAGC TGTAGCTACGTAGCTAGTAGCTAGCTAGCTAGCTACGTACGATCGATGCTAGCATGCTG CTAGTCGTTTCTAGGCCCAGTAGTTTCAGGAGATCGAGGAGACTAGGAGGGACTAGGA TCGATCGATGAGTAGAGAGCTGCATGCGAGCAGCTAGGCATCGATCGTAGTGTCAAGT AAACTGCATGCGATCGATGCTATGACTAGTCGTGAGCATGTGCTTTTTTTAGCTAGCCC CAAAAACGATCGACGTCTATGTACGTACGTAGCGTAGTCGATCGGACTAGATGCTGCAT ACCACACATCGTGCATGCTGATGCTGATGCTAGCTAGCTAGCTAGCTGTAGCGACTAGCT BEAT THAT! jk by the way
insane_alien Posted December 8, 2006 Posted December 8, 2006 i have the sequence GATTACA 7 times in my DNA lets see who gets this one.
JTM³ Posted December 14, 2006 Posted December 14, 2006 technically, theoretical molecules can give you longer words than even that. HOW?! Is it just how their naming conventions are arranged? who needs theoretical, the IUPAC name of human DNA would fill several libraries. See above. Linky?
ecoli Posted December 14, 2006 Posted December 14, 2006 HOW?! Is it just how their naming conventions are arranged? in theory, you could just keep adding functional groups and making the molecule name longer. Technically, there would be no upper limit to the size of the molecule, and the name of the compound. Obviously, physical laws don't actually allow for this to occur in nature.
Sisyphus Posted December 14, 2006 Posted December 14, 2006 Technical words shouldn't count, since they can just be indefinitely large. The longest non-technical, non-proper noun, non-joke (a word created specifically to be long) word in the English language is floccinaucinihilipilification. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_word
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now