Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

why is the spherical volume element r^2 sin phi dr d phi d theta ? and not r^2 dr dphi d theta ?

 

 

it doesn' make sense to me as r theta is the arc length in a circle and so r^2 theta x phi should give the area element for a sphere, and then why not just allow for an infinitesimal amount of depth with dr and then declare that the volume element?

 

also why is the angle phi drawn off the z axis and not the x axis like theta is?

Posted

An easy way to visualize why [math]dV = r^2\, \sin\phi\,dr\,d\phi\,d\theta[/math] is to look at a globe of the Earth. A line of latitude is the set of points with constant r and phi. The arc length of a line of latitude varies with the latitude:

[math]l=2\pi\,R_e \sin(\frac{\pi}2-\phi^\prime)[/math]

where [math]\phi^\prime[/math] is the latitude.

Denoting [math]\phi=\frac{\pi}2-\phi^\prime[/math] yields

[math]l=2\pi\,R_e\,\sin\phi[/math]

A small portion of this arc has length

[math]dl=R_e sin\phi\,d\theta[/math]

 

Replace the line of latitude with a thin band with angular deflection [math]d\phi[/math]. The area of a small chunk of this band is

[math]dA=R_e^{\,2} sin\phi\,d\theta\,d\phi[/math]

 

Now extend the band to the center of the Earth. The volume of a small chunk

of this conical volume is

[math]dV=r^2 sin \phi \, d \theta \, d\phi \, dr[/math]

Posted

but wouldn't rsin phi be a line parrelel to the x axis going from some point p to the z axis?

 

I think my main problem with this is that for arc length I think theta * R, and so if you think of the plane formed by the z and x axeses, then the arc length should be given by r phi.

Posted
but wouldn't rsin phi be a line parrelel to the x axis going from some point p to the z axis?

I don't know quite what you mean by this.

 

I think my main problem with this is that for arc length I think theta * R, and so if you think of the plane formed by the z and x axeses, then the arc length should be given by r phi.

That works in two dimensions, but not in three. What is the radius [math]r[/math]?

 

Look at a globe of the Earth (or do it in your head if you don't have a globe). Each line of constant latitude is a circle. The circles are tiny near the poles and become a great circle at the equator. What is the radius of the circle at latitude [math]\delta[/math] (colatitude [math]\phi=90^{\circ}-\delta[/math])?

Posted
That works in two dimensions, but not in three. What is the radius ?

 

Look at a globe of the Earth (or do it in your head if you don't have a globe). Each line of constant latitude is a circle. The circles are tiny near the poles and become a great circle at the equator. What is the radius of the circle at latitude (colatitude )?

 

ah now I get it thank you.

 

that also explains why the angle is drawn off the z axis towards the xy plane instead of from the xy plane towards the z axis. awesome thankyou.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Calculate the Jacobian factor when changing from cartesian coordinates to polar coordinates and you will get the factors you desire.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.