khenemetre Posted December 22, 2006 Share Posted December 22, 2006 How can physicists say that particles, for example the photon or theoretical graviton, 'carry' forces? It just seems more logical to me that forces are caused by disturbances in a universal field that manifests itself as the Four Fundamental Forces. So a nucleon absorbs a gluon (Strong force) emited by another nucleon and they're automatically supposed to be attracted to eachother? Wouldn't it be more likely that forces are caused by fields themselves, not particles? Can anyone explain this to me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted December 22, 2006 Share Posted December 22, 2006 Particles are just parts of a field in a similar sense as a wave (particle) is part of the ocean (field). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khenemetre Posted January 9, 2007 Author Share Posted January 9, 2007 So they're like metaphors for the way fields work? Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted January 15, 2007 Share Posted January 15, 2007 It´s rather a way to (mathematically) describe the exitation/state of a field than only a metaphor. You can describe the state of the ocean surface by giving a water-height to each point or you can start with a flat surface and add waves (areas where the height is raised) to it. The former method clearly describes the state but the latter might be more practically interesting for certain applications (e.g. a surfer). While describing a field in QFT is slightly different technically, the idea to get a practical (i.e. useful) description of the field by using waves/particles is the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now