Animal Posted December 22, 2006 Share Posted December 22, 2006 After watching Kenneth Miller discuss the fusion of chromosome #2 I'm still wondering how this happened.. Did this "fusion" take place within an individual at some point in history and would this individual be able to mate with an individual who still had 48 chromosomes? I can't find anything online that explains it. Somebody please help me out thanks. -Hunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokele Posted December 23, 2006 Share Posted December 23, 2006 I think they'd still be able to mate. Because it's a fusion, no genetic material is either lost or duplicated, and also, because they just fused at the ends, the fused chromosome would be able to line up with the un-fused ones during meiosis, allowing viable gametes to be produced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted December 23, 2006 Author Share Posted December 23, 2006 This is a pretty disgusting thought but, today would it be possible for humans and other primates to mate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluenoise Posted December 24, 2006 Share Posted December 24, 2006 NO. Well you could "mate" but no viable offspring could be produced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animal Posted December 24, 2006 Author Share Posted December 24, 2006 Then what makes us different than the first to have the fused chromosomes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FreeThinker Posted December 25, 2006 Share Posted December 25, 2006 Then what makes us different than the first to have the fused chromosomes? Since then we have undergone more changes and therefore became more genetically different. Also, the chimpanzees \evolved in another direction. There was probably some geographical split between the species ( our common ancerstor). One side of the split led to us ( with the merged chromosome) and the other led to the chimpanzees. Maybe the merged chromosome enabled survival in another territory ( such as swamplands for example as suggested by the 'aquatic ape' theory). This could have led to the split which resulted in the two species. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now