Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyone,

Is it correct to add solar energy to the bottom of an energy pyramid describing a food chain? Most I have looked at on the internet don't, but wikipedia says that you can. Does anyone have a definitive answer?

Thanks very much,

Scott:-)

Posted

We know that at the beginning of an aquatic food chain are the primary producers, known as autotrophs. These include single celled phytoplankton, algae and seagrasses and as a whole, constitute the largest percentage of web biomass. Autotrophs convert solar energy into chemical energy and transform simple inorganic molecules to more complex organic molecules. This is accomplished by absorbing energy from the sun and releasing oxygen into the water and atmosphere.

 

Hence, i think solar energy sholud be included in primary producers level.

Posted

It's not strictly necessary to add it, as the pyramid begins with the producers in the living system. But it won't hurt to add it.

 

(Unless you are dealing with an autotrophic or chemotrophic system, where the sun plays no role, such as the habitat around a deep sea sulphur vent.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.