Jump to content

Septenary Units (split from Different Planck Units)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Purpose of my work is simple: consistence and obedience to God's Sunday-related Commandment at once without contradiction. My system is only technically possible system that is both fully consistent and fully Sunday-compatible. And it has only one basic unit - daynight, and septenary multiples/submultiples with septenary exponent-numeral-derived prefixes.

 

Additionally because I have some doubts, I ask about dimensional status of rest of SI base units such as ampere, mole and candela. Are they really dimensionless in geometrized units, or is possible converting of them into seconds? Please confirm or deny this, and if confirmation is possible, provide me relevant conversion factors from these units to secons (and if not possible to unity) in form of expressions containing constants.

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

My Excel conversion mentioned above works fine with almost all Biblical non-time units:

 

http://cccolo.com/BibleWeightsAndMeasures.htm

 

http://scriptures.lds.org/en/bd/w/7

 

approximate <> exact from geometrization constants and multiples/submultiples of daynight

 

fingerbreadth 1.85E-2m ~ 1,59063203626137E-02m

handbreadth 7.4E-2m ~ 1,11344242538296E-01m

long cubit 5.18E-1m ~ 7,79409697768071E-01m

long reed 3.11E0m ~ 5,4558678843765E+00m

furlong 2.0117E+2m ~ 2,67337526334448E+02m

 

gerah 5.7E-4kg ~ 3,9579777481142E-04kg

shekel 1.14E-2kg ~ 1,93940909657596E-02kg

talent 3.42E+1kg ~ 4,65652124087887E+01kg

 

and proves that Biblical units are remnants of God's consistent septenary system reconstructed by me (even Hungarians in antiquity used septenary counting: http://www.rmki.kfki.hu/~lukacs/big7.htm)

Posted

I confirmed finally, that ampere, mole and candela are dimensionless, because:

 

ampere: (amount of electron-lengths per time) 'Dimensionless Ratio', 'electric current' as in table at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_unit_system

 

mole: 'certain number of particles' as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Geometrized_unit_system#Unit_conversion

 

candela: (amount of photon-lengths per time per spherical angle) 'dimension 0' as in http://www.brooksdesign-cg.com/Code/Html/Lm/LMunitSI.htm, additionally radian and steradian are too dimensionless supplemental units

 

Due to fact, that dimensionless radian and steradian are both dimensionless and supplementary/derived units in SI, I will too treat dimensionless ampere, mole and candela as supplementary/derived units in this reconstructed God's septenary system, choosing skipping them from my Excel table, and retaining only conversion from daynight into all four dimensionful base SI units such as metre, kilogram, second and kelvin, that all have dimension of distance along any dimension axis such as X,Y,Z or T.

Posted

I now need to go into geometrically dimensionless SI base units, and because of geometrical dimensionessness of ampere, mole, and candela, I think that some visualisations are needed:

 

For ampere: Because 1A = 1 C/s, and because 1s equals 3.47921161E25C from this expression:

c^3/((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5) [C/s]=[A], verifiable here: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=c%5E3%2F%28%28G%2F%284*pi*%28electric+constant%29%29%29%5E0.5%29&btnG=Google+Search I can visualize resultant dimensionless unit of current as one second of space that equals 3.47921161E25C and 299792458m, that flows in one second of time. Due to this, I will rather consider coulomb as next base unit, because it has dimension of distance, and was not present in previous set of units such as meter, kilogram, second and kelvin.

 

For mole: Because 1mol= 1NA, I can visualize one mole as 6.0221415E23 dimensionless units, thus I will discard it completely, because it is not even ratio of two dimensionful units.

 

For candela: Because 1cd is 1/683 [W/sr], I will rather consider lumens to discard dimensionless steradian that is a dimensionless ratio of areas. 1 lm equals 1/683 [W], that equals [J/s] and [kg*m^2/s^3], and because ratio of length*mass^2 to time^3 is the same as ratio of distance^3 to distance^3, I can visualize lumen as dimensionless ratio of volumes, which makes lumen in its parts and its wholeness a totally dimensionless unit, consisted of ratios of dimensionful units such as meter, kilogram, and second which all have dimension of distance. Because lumen contains no additional units besides meter, kilogram, second, coulomb and kelvin, I will discard it completely.

 

source: http://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/31/312/ncsr/devices/led/ch_11_human_vision.pdf

 

Please verify if my explanations are correct in geometrized units?

Posted
Please verify if my explanations are correct in geometrized units?
I'm afraid you're on your own here. No one sees any value in your work on septenary units despite your insistence that it is crucial for us to help you with it.

 

Best of luck to you. I would suggest another site where you can garner more enthusiasm for your... crusade.

 

Thread closed.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.