TurricaN Posted April 5, 2007 Author Posted April 5, 2007 Purpose of my work is simple: consistence and obedience to God's Sunday-related Commandment at once without contradiction. My system is only technically possible system that is both fully consistent and fully Sunday-compatible. And it has only one basic unit - daynight, and septenary multiples/submultiples with septenary exponent-numeral-derived prefixes. Additionally because I have some doubts, I ask about dimensional status of rest of SI base units such as ampere, mole and candela. Are they really dimensionless in geometrized units, or is possible converting of them into seconds? Please confirm or deny this, and if confirmation is possible, provide me relevant conversion factors from these units to secons (and if not possible to unity) in form of expressions containing constants.
TurricaN Posted April 6, 2007 Author Posted April 6, 2007 My Excel conversion mentioned above works fine with almost all Biblical non-time units: http://cccolo.com/BibleWeightsAndMeasures.htm http://scriptures.lds.org/en/bd/w/7 approximate <> exact from geometrization constants and multiples/submultiples of daynight fingerbreadth 1.85E-2m ~ 1,59063203626137E-02m handbreadth 7.4E-2m ~ 1,11344242538296E-01m long cubit 5.18E-1m ~ 7,79409697768071E-01m long reed 3.11E0m ~ 5,4558678843765E+00m furlong 2.0117E+2m ~ 2,67337526334448E+02m gerah 5.7E-4kg ~ 3,9579777481142E-04kg shekel 1.14E-2kg ~ 1,93940909657596E-02kg talent 3.42E+1kg ~ 4,65652124087887E+01kg and proves that Biblical units are remnants of God's consistent septenary system reconstructed by me (even Hungarians in antiquity used septenary counting: http://www.rmki.kfki.hu/~lukacs/big7.htm)
TurricaN Posted April 10, 2007 Author Posted April 10, 2007 I confirmed finally, that ampere, mole and candela are dimensionless, because: ampere: (amount of electron-lengths per time) 'Dimensionless Ratio', 'electric current' as in table at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrized_unit_system mole: 'certain number of particles' as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Geometrized_unit_system#Unit_conversion candela: (amount of photon-lengths per time per spherical angle) 'dimension 0' as in http://www.brooksdesign-cg.com/Code/Html/Lm/LMunitSI.htm, additionally radian and steradian are too dimensionless supplemental units Due to fact, that dimensionless radian and steradian are both dimensionless and supplementary/derived units in SI, I will too treat dimensionless ampere, mole and candela as supplementary/derived units in this reconstructed God's septenary system, choosing skipping them from my Excel table, and retaining only conversion from daynight into all four dimensionful base SI units such as metre, kilogram, second and kelvin, that all have dimension of distance along any dimension axis such as X,Y,Z or T.
TurricaN Posted April 16, 2007 Author Posted April 16, 2007 Finally our discussion about septenary geometrized units was crowned by releasing by me principles and creation process of such system in article placed here: http://www.internet-encyclopedia.org/index.php/Septimalisation
TurricaN Posted April 16, 2007 Author Posted April 16, 2007 I now need to go into geometrically dimensionless SI base units, and because of geometrical dimensionessness of ampere, mole, and candela, I think that some visualisations are needed: For ampere: Because 1A = 1 C/s, and because 1s equals 3.47921161E25C from this expression: c^3/((G/(4*pi*(electric constant)))^0.5) [C/s]=[A], verifiable here: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=c%5E3%2F%28%28G%2F%284*pi*%28electric+constant%29%29%29%5E0.5%29&btnG=Google+Search I can visualize resultant dimensionless unit of current as one second of space that equals 3.47921161E25C and 299792458m, that flows in one second of time. Due to this, I will rather consider coulomb as next base unit, because it has dimension of distance, and was not present in previous set of units such as meter, kilogram, second and kelvin. For mole: Because 1mol= 1NA, I can visualize one mole as 6.0221415E23 dimensionless units, thus I will discard it completely, because it is not even ratio of two dimensionful units. For candela: Because 1cd is 1/683 [W/sr], I will rather consider lumens to discard dimensionless steradian that is a dimensionless ratio of areas. 1 lm equals 1/683 [W], that equals [J/s] and [kg*m^2/s^3], and because ratio of length*mass^2 to time^3 is the same as ratio of distance^3 to distance^3, I can visualize lumen as dimensionless ratio of volumes, which makes lumen in its parts and its wholeness a totally dimensionless unit, consisted of ratios of dimensionful units such as meter, kilogram, and second which all have dimension of distance. Because lumen contains no additional units besides meter, kilogram, second, coulomb and kelvin, I will discard it completely. source: http://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/31/312/ncsr/devices/led/ch_11_human_vision.pdf Please verify if my explanations are correct in geometrized units?
Phi for All Posted April 18, 2007 Posted April 18, 2007 Please verify if my explanations are correct in geometrized units?I'm afraid you're on your own here. No one sees any value in your work on septenary units despite your insistence that it is crucial for us to help you with it. Best of luck to you. I would suggest another site where you can garner more enthusiasm for your... crusade. Thread closed.
Recommended Posts