grimmy Posted February 8, 2007 Author Share Posted February 8, 2007 "idiotic troll"...is that the technical term? or are you this mean to everybody that has a belief that differs from yours? guess what buddy...not everyone is going to agree with your crap anymore than theyll agree with mine. ive learned to accept that...maybe you should consider it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Royston Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 "idiotic troll"...is that the technical term? or are you this mean to everybody that has a belief that differs from yours? guess what buddy...not everyone is going to agree with your crap anymore than theyll agree with mine. ive learned to accept that...maybe you should consider it.... You can 'believe' whatever you like, everything Klaynos has stated is within cosmological principles. I don't think it's necessary to state how fundamental a principle of cosmology is, look it up, and then come back. EDIT: I've just written a massive spiel about backing up your argument...but look at 'so you think you have a new theory.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tree Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 "idiotic troll"...is that the technical term?Yes, I am let to belive that it originated from the usenet group alt.folklore.urban, you can look it up if you like.or are you this mean to everybody that has a belief that differs from yours?You could find out your answer to that by flicking through Klay's post history, but since research isn't your strong point I'll tell you that no, this forum community does not consider it acceptable to be mean to anyone who presents ideas thoughtfully with well referenced sources and if need-be relevent evidence, nor do they consider it acceptable to taunt anyone before giving them a chance to rectify their actions. People who spout absolute rubbish and do not make any effort to stop however, are fair game.guess what buddy...not everyone is going to agree with your crap anymore than theyll agree with mine.Well yes, they will, deal with it. Klay has a knack for actually researching some of his ideas and when he speculates I'd assume that he would start by looking for something that actually happens and then looking for a reason.ive learned to accept that...maybe you should consider it....Are you seriously suggesting that Klay should give up citing the scientific method and really basic mainstream science on the basis that someone is going to refuse to even work with it without a good reason? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 "idiotic troll"...is that the technical term? or are you this mean to everybody that has a belief that differs from yours? guess what buddy...not everyone is going to agree with your crap anymore than theyll agree with mine. ive learned to accept that...maybe you should consider it.... Please note that I said we are more likely to label you as that, not that I already had. And infact the way I wrote the second part of that statement "...and move on..." implied that in replying to you I had not infact done so. Don't take offence, it was a warning of how people online label people. And when people ignore significant evidence and spout ideas which have been shown to be wrong, I'm normally FAR FAR more mean. But I don't actually think you're a bad guy. Thanks for your support guys, and in my own defence, I'm ill. Any chance of just dropping back on topic now, the other points in my last post are far more worthy of discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grimmy Posted February 8, 2007 Author Share Posted February 8, 2007 OK, first things first. Klaynos, I apologize for reading into what you said. Second, I must admit that I have been having second thoughts, not only about how to develop this idea of mine into a true theory, but also on its fundamentals. I recently have taken all of your ideas and put them together, and have seen that there are some significant errors in what I posted as a "theory." I intend to begin work on a new idea, hopefully one that can be proven more easily, and also that does not cause as much negative controversy. Thank you all for your input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the tree Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 That's great, while you're at it feel free to ask questions on the science boards and contribute all over the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 grimmy I'm glad You don't need to apologise, I was a bit harsh. And I truely look forward to seeing what you've got to say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now