Royston Posted February 21, 2007 Posted February 21, 2007 Darwin's Watch - The Science of Discworld III...by Terry Pratchett, Ian Stewart, Jack Cohen A little premature, as I only read the first chapter last night, but I'm hooked and hopefully (time permitting) I'll be finished next week. Probably a daft question, but has anyone read Darwin's Watch ? It's probably best I ask if anybody is willing to discuss any of the content, before I start posting, just so I know it's not falling on deaf ears, but just the first chapter raises some very important issues...presented in a very uncluttered and refreshing manner, with Pratchett's satirical humour to boot. I realize some of the subject matter could be considered delicate, so if anyone feels it's probably an inappropriate book to discuss, please shout. Here's the synopsis from Amazon, which may persuade some of you to grab a copy... Roundworld is in trouble again' date=' and this time it looks fatal. Having created it in the first place, the wizards of Unseen University feel vaguely responsible for its safety. They know the creatures who lived there escaped the impending Big Freeze by inventing the space elevator - they even intervened to rid the planet of a plague of elves, who attempted to divert humanity onto a different time track. But now it's all gone wrong - Victorian England has stagnated and the pace of progress would embarrass a limping snail. Unless something drastic is done, there won't be time for anyone to invent spaceflight and the human race will be turned into ice-pops. Why, though, did history come adrift? Was it Sir Arthur Nightingale's dismal book about natural selection? Or was it the devastating response by an obscure country vicar called Charles Darwin, whose bestselling "Theology of Species" made it impossible to refute the divine design of living creatures? Either way, it's no easy task to change history, as the wizards discover to their cost. Can the God of Evolution come to humanity's aid and ensure Darwin writes a very different book? And who stopped him writing it in the first place? "The hard science is as gripping as the fiction" - "The Times". "Entertaining and illuminating" - "New Scientist".[/quote']
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now