Sayonara Posted January 22, 2004 Share Posted January 22, 2004 MrL_JaKiri said in post # :What's the opposite of a cat? See the whole pencil thing ^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted January 22, 2004 Share Posted January 22, 2004 there can be no deffinitive opposite of a cat, as to have an "opposite" you must deal with finites. in this instance NOT a cat would be the logical answer, however flawed. Opposites (true) deal with Finites. matematics or geometry. `A `maybe said to be the Opposite of `B` or Geometricaly Opposed. for a Cat ANY cat (and therein lies the problem) the Opposite may not be correctly applied Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crash Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 Q. since gravity is derived from space being curved,would it have an oppisite were space had a distribution of matter with no intrinsic mass. can there be a anti gravity? cause the only apparent thong with no oppisite is gravity............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 YT2095 said in post # : you present an iteresting idea when talking about a specific color, phase cancelation with addative or subtractive synthesis of color would be interesting from a semantic point of veiw, it could be argued that it would be the opposite of Green, infact it would be a conflicting waveforn, peak to trough in anti-phase. the true opposite it black though, you`de be simply providing a means to obtain black wot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted January 23, 2004 Author Share Posted January 23, 2004 since gravity is derived from space being curved,would it have an oppisite were space had a distribution of matter with no intrinsic mass. can there be a anti gravity? cause the only apparent thong with no oppisite is gravity............... hmmm.... maybe the opposite of gravity could be a force that pushes you away from matter and not towards it. Maybe it could have an opposite effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 There is an antigravity, that is derived from the interaction of antimass (NOT ANTIMATTER, that's a positive mass with a reversed charge, but antimass; negative energy) with normal mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted January 23, 2004 Author Share Posted January 23, 2004 oh ok. So there we have it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 It doesn't mean there's an antieverything else though. And -ve mass is only speculatory at best, although so was antimatter once. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted January 23, 2004 Author Share Posted January 23, 2004 oh ok. So case closed! Thanx alot for fixing everything up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 LOL, that`s either inspired more questions, or the fear about ever asking anything again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted January 23, 2004 Author Share Posted January 23, 2004 no. not really but, i get the general idea ! And yes, there are about a billion other questions ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 YT2095 runs seriously tho, post away dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted January 23, 2004 Author Share Posted January 23, 2004 ok. MrL_JaKiri said antimass and NOT antimatter. What is the difference between mass and matter. Doesn't matter make up mass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 mass is a bit like weight, matter has volume. for most instances when talking in terms of that contain gravity in the positive mass can sometimes be replaced with the term weight. in zero G however a body is said to have MASS but no weight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted January 23, 2004 Author Share Posted January 23, 2004 oh ok. And we would call gravity associated with anti-mass, antigravity? Would that have a different effect to what we feel here? Other than the strength of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 anti mass I know little about, anti grav as far as I`m aware doesn`t exist outside of sci-fi films and comic books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 Except that if you have antimass you have to have antigravity...? MrL_JaKiri said in post # :There is an antigravity, that is derived from the interaction of antimass (NOT ANTIMATTER, that's a positive mass with a reversed charge, but antimass; negative energy) with normal mass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 aommaster said in post # :ok. MrL_JaKiri said antimass and NOT antimatter. What is the difference between mass and matter. Doesn't matter make up mass? Matter is the 'stuff' in question. Mass is a quantity of the stuff. It's like saying that people are made of tall to say that mass = matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted January 23, 2004 Author Share Posted January 23, 2004 oh ok. Thanx guys for all of ur help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 Sayonara³ said in post # :Except that if you have antimass you have to have antigravity...? At it's very simplest, F = GmM/d^2. For real distances, d^2 will be positive, and G IS positive, so obviously you'll get negative values if m and M have a different sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 surely if M or m have a different sign. M and m would just give you a positive again. aah, reminds me of Dirac. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 Radical Edward said in post # :surely if M or m have a different sign. M and m would just give you a positive again. aah, reminds me of Dirac. Positive times negative equals negative duder. Your brain isn't on today. P*P=P P*N = N N*N = P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBC Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 Anti-Grav and Anti-Mass are synonamous. Anti-mass experiments have been performed by creating an intense magnetic field around an object freeing it of the effects of gravity (this was done terrestrialy). Though I really don't believe "anti" is the proper term for the absence of, but should instead be reserved for things that come into conflict or stand in opposition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 CBC said in post # :Anti-Grav and Anti-Mass are synonamous. Anti-mass experiments have been performed by creating an intense magnetic field around an object freeing it of the effects of gravity (this was done terrestrialy). Though I really don't believe "anti" is the proper term for the absence of, but should instead be reserved for things that come into conflict or stand in opposition. That's not what I'm talking about at all, and as far as I've heard that's quackery from russia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted January 23, 2004 Share Posted January 23, 2004 MrL_JaKiri said in post # : Positive times negative equals negative duder. Your brain isn't on today. P*P=P P*N = N N*N = P exactly duder, which is why only one of M and m can be positive, zou said: For real distances, d^2 will be positive, and G IS positive, so obviously you'll get negative values if m and M have a different sign. the and should be an or I reckon btw I reckon the duder meme is the new sup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now