avshalom co Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 if i will get remark-its will help me to understand what do you think, maybe i am wrong or maybe i am just,but i am give a new point of view-so post replay sometime it is significant,and sometimes it is good to know just people have an idea about this-thank you for the attention cohen avshalom charly isreal/haifa http://www.icarus5.com
fredrik Posted March 23, 2007 Posted March 23, 2007 Are you thinking of quantized changes? There are some ideas related to this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_network I think the basis for the thinking is that a surface - a 2 dimensional set, can either be thought of as a connection or correlation between 2 different 3 dimensional sets, or also as deviation between from two 1 dimensional sets. For any given confidence level, there is a minimum confidence interval. Typically 100% requires an infinitely many samples, just like determining position exactly in QM requires infinite momentum. In a certain sense there is a analogy with sample size and confidence, and momentum, I thikn it can even be sort of identified with the confidence. So the confidence level is implied in your prior. In which case it almost seems trivial. This is interesting stuff... there are I think several opinions on this and most of it is technically speculations, but there's little doubt that it will mature eventually. /Fredrik
avshalom co Posted April 3, 2007 Author Posted April 3, 2007 thank you Fredrik for the replay,i had a problem with my computer,and i lost some information because i had to format my computer-but i was returning and i was happy to got your remark i was read your remark and the link,and i dont know what to tell you,of course i hope to get more remark like that,and i save your remark and hop i will help me in the future . if there will be anther remark i will glade to discus about them. keep watching cohen avshalom charly isreal/haifa http://www.icarus5.com
dstebbins Posted May 10, 2007 Posted May 10, 2007 Umm..., if i will get remark-its will help me to understand what do you think, maybe i am wrong or maybe i am just,but i am give a new point of view-so post replay sometime it is significant,and sometimes it is good to know just people have an idea about this-thank you for the attention cohen avshalom charly isreal/haifa http://www.icarus5.com thank you Fredrik for the replay,i had a problem with my computer,and i lost some information because i had to format my computer-but i was returning and i was happy to got your remark i was read your remark and the link,and i dont know what to tell you,of course i hope to get more remark like that,and i save your remark and hop i will help me in the future .if there will be anther remark i will glade to discus about them. keep watching cohen avshalom charly isreal/haifa http://www.icarus5.com i make it more easy to understand!!! Sorry for my rudeness, but could you try not typing with your chin? I seriously can't understand a word you're saying.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now