YT2095 Posted January 28, 2004 Posted January 28, 2004 is neutral the right word though? I have my doubts about this. an equal and opposite counter force or cancelation yes, I`m not sure if it would be neutral in the strict sense of the word though? a bit like 2 cars trying to pull away with equal force but attatched by a rope, ok the rope doesn`t move (no frequency), but it`s not exactly neutral per se, it`s still under strain.
JaKiri Posted January 28, 2004 Posted January 28, 2004 I don't see how this will generate energy though. 2nd Law.
YT2095 Posted January 28, 2004 Posted January 28, 2004 Nor I, but we hadn`t got to that part yet, I was saving that bit till last
Radical Edward Posted January 28, 2004 Posted January 28, 2004 MrL_JaKiri said in post # :I don't see how this will generate energy though. 2nd Law. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law?
YT2095 Posted January 28, 2004 Posted January 28, 2004 1. may not harm or allow harm to come to a human being, either through action or inaction. 2. as above in post #54 3. a robot must protect it`s own existance as long as such protection does not conflict with the 1`st and 2`nd laws. Asimov Rules
Deckard Posted January 29, 2004 Author Posted January 29, 2004 my father is currently looking up the correct "term" for it but for now we just call it neutral field "for now" till we find the exact meaning
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now