Radical Edward Posted February 3, 2004 Posted February 3, 2004 because all light headed in your direction from across the entire universe would arrive at your eye constantly. in short, you would get a bad case of sunburn, and would need a good pair of ray-bans.
bt redliner Posted February 3, 2004 Posted February 3, 2004 I apologized, for my stupid post. I’m new to this type of things, and is sure confusing the shit out of me.
bt redliner Posted February 3, 2004 Posted February 3, 2004 -Demosthenes- said in post # :Who confused the crap out of who? No one, i meant all this light speed thoeries are confusing, to me. which makes me post senseless stuff
-Demosthenes- Posted February 3, 2004 Posted February 3, 2004 Especially to me! ?? Why can't this be easy to understand?
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted February 3, 2004 Author Posted February 3, 2004 You are fated to confusion. Mwahahahahaha!
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted February 4, 2004 Author Posted February 4, 2004 Well, it isn't. Anyway, BT redliner, what is your theory anyway?
bt redliner Posted February 4, 2004 Posted February 4, 2004 that (time) travels, at the speed of light
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted February 4, 2004 Author Posted February 4, 2004 How can time travel at the speed of light? Explain!
bt redliner Posted February 4, 2004 Posted February 4, 2004 Let me ask you a question. what happen if you go at the speed of light. time will stop right?
bt redliner Posted February 4, 2004 Posted February 4, 2004 Think about it, time will stop because you'll be going at the same vilocity. am i still not making any sense?
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted February 4, 2004 Author Posted February 4, 2004 Yes, but you would have to go in the same direction as time. Time doesn't really have direction! Time cannot flow from one place to another, if it did that theory would work.
wolfson Posted February 4, 2004 Posted February 4, 2004 Do you mean time travelling will have a conection to the speed of light?
YT2095 Posted February 4, 2004 Posted February 4, 2004 Ditto! esp when you consider that even light takes time to get from A to B, so this "no time at all" comment hardly seems logical? edit: this post applies to posts# 48, 49 and 50. didn`t see it was a 2 pager (having a bad day, just ignore me, I`m harmless mostly)
bt redliner Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 "Time doesn't really have direction" if this is true then , indeed time traveling is impossible
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted February 5, 2004 Author Posted February 5, 2004 And that is what modern theory says.
bt redliner Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 (Question) Do you guys thing these thoeries, will oneday be proven?
Aegir Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 Personaly I am going to go with no on the first question... I had a reason but it left during the course of my reading of your tangent... As for time=C ... I don't think so. Personaly I think time is not really a dimension in the same sense as space is a dimension, I think time is simply an ilusion impregnated upon the human mind. I havent really had a chance to ratinalize all the possibilities of that yet seeing as I just thought of it a couple of days ago while reading these forums.
fafalone Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 On the original question... Of course the speed of light changes, every time it passes through a material it slows down depending on the properties of the material. It's even been completely stopped in recent experiments. Now the speed of light through a vacuum © may also indeed change slightly over billions of years.
fafalone Posted February 5, 2004 Posted February 5, 2004 how what... in a material or in a vacuum over time?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now