Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

define "Same" and explain How they are folded?

 

there`s a kazillion and One ways to fold it twice, and no 2 things are Ever the "Same"

Posted

You end up with a "weak" corner, which is four flappy bits, a "medium" corner opposite it, which is two folded bits, and the remaining side has a "strong" corner at each end, which are one folded bit with two layers.

Posted

Sayonara is hot on it but I find your terms confusing, when you speak of opposite corners and a remaining side. Are the two "strong" corners, in your terminology, topologically identical?

Posted

The strong corners are of course at each end of the second fold. If you cut them off the napkin in the same fashion, you could orient them so that they were identical. However in the overall topology of the intact napkin, I suppose they need to be identified differently.

 

It rather depends on where you consider a corner to start and end :confused:

 

What was your error?

Posted

they can`t be, in the way he explained, as one of the 2 will have a fold connecting them and the other will not.

 

4 single

2 doubles (2 fold each)

1 single (4 layers 3 folds)

2 doubles (2 layers 1 fold)

Posted

not at all, I only expanded upon what Sayo said, as it seemed you didn`t quite get what he was saying initialy :)

 

just had a different way of saying it is all.

 

 

and peek at what?

Posted

only a mental image of what you said, and then just described what I see.

so perhaps a Virtual Napkin, maybe from Burger King or something, I dunno?

Posted

Species in my case :P

 

seriously though, can`t you picture the 2 simple folds in your head? I find that almost unbelievable if you (or anyone can`t)!

it`s simple 3D geometry, hell you can even 4D that one with ease :)

 

EDIT: actualy, I`m not sure this really classes as an "Inteligence test" per se when I think about it, more of a Spatial awareness test I would think.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

AFAIK, spatial reasoning is considered one of maybe half a dozen to a dozen components to the stupidly amorphous "quantity" we call intelligence. And yes, that is an incredibly easy one. :P

Posted

I vizualize all the scalar-longitudinal field modes in my photon study, including magnetic backstraps in the propagation direction. Here with napkin-folding I guess I'm just "incredibly" stupid. Sigh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.