bascule Posted June 23, 2007 Share Posted June 23, 2007 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3132857754400064872 Notice the collapse sequence. The same collapse sequence laid out in the NIST report: 1) North penthouse collapses 2) Seconds pass 3) South penthouse begins to collapse 4) The rest of the building collapses Have you ever seen a controlled demolition occur in such a fashion? Or is this video more consistent with an internal structural failure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callipygous Posted June 23, 2007 Share Posted June 23, 2007 dont these normally go in pseudoscience? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted June 23, 2007 Share Posted June 23, 2007 do we have to go over this yet again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realitycheck Posted June 24, 2007 Share Posted June 24, 2007 This is the craziest stuff I have ever heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasori Posted June 25, 2007 Share Posted June 25, 2007 ...The OP was saying that it's /not/ a collision, therefore, no, we have nothing to go over. It's only when someone tries to say that the unordinary collapse order there was controlled that we get a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bascule Posted June 27, 2007 Author Share Posted June 27, 2007 do we have to go over this yet again? This is a thread about substantive information congruent with the official FEMA report. Much like the thread about a computer simulation the collapse of the twin towers (in a way also consistent with the official report), the 9/11 conspiracists don't seem to want to touch this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now