bascule Posted June 23, 2007 Posted June 23, 2007 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3132857754400064872 Notice the collapse sequence. The same collapse sequence laid out in the NIST report: 1) North penthouse collapses 2) Seconds pass 3) South penthouse begins to collapse 4) The rest of the building collapses Have you ever seen a controlled demolition occur in such a fashion? Or is this video more consistent with an internal structural failure?
Rasori Posted June 25, 2007 Posted June 25, 2007 ...The OP was saying that it's /not/ a collision, therefore, no, we have nothing to go over. It's only when someone tries to say that the unordinary collapse order there was controlled that we get a problem.
bascule Posted June 27, 2007 Author Posted June 27, 2007 do we have to go over this yet again? This is a thread about substantive information congruent with the official FEMA report. Much like the thread about a computer simulation the collapse of the twin towers (in a way also consistent with the official report), the 9/11 conspiracists don't seem to want to touch this one.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now