bascule Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 The water-fueled car is often the basis of stupid perpetual motion schemes. Typically this involves some sort of wacky electrolysis device, ones which are claimed to somehow release hydrogen in a way that has a positive net energy output. After all, that's the only way a car could run on water, right? Well, there's another way. Rather than using an electrical reaction, you can use a chemical reaction. In this case, with boron: http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/energy-fuels/mg19125621.200 The basic idea: fill your car with water... and boron. The boron reacts with the water to produce boron oxide and hydrogen gas. The hydrogen gas can then be run through a fuel cell. After it's been passed through the fuel cell the water vapor produced can be heated and then passed through the boron reactor again. The boron oxide produced from the reaction with the water can also be collected and reused... a closed system! You returne the boron oxide to a processing plant to be converted back into boron. Here we've reacted a certifiable point of energy input into the system... the boron oxide is converted to boron through a series of chemical reactions, and the only energy input is... solar! A combination of solar heating and solar electricity generation fuels various processes which allow for a completely closed system to convert the boron oxide back to boron. Here's a diagram of that process: http://environment.newscientist.com/data/images/archive/2562/25621201.jpg The end result is a 100% emission free way to power cars BRILLIANT!
YT2095 Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 in fact it`s cheaper than boron, and the only waste product is Aluminium hydroxide soln. no solar needed anywhere at all.
swansont Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 in fact it`s cheaper than boron, and the only waste product is Aluminium hydroxide soln. no solar needed anywhere at all. What about reprocessing the solution back into alumin(i)um?
YT2095 Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 it would take as much, if not more Energy to do that than the H2 liberated would provide. although it can be used as building material and also in Medicine
swansont Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 it would take as much, if not more Energy to do that than the H2 liberated would provide.although it can be used as building material and also in Medicine It would take more, to be sure. I'm not looking at this as a perpetual motion machine. (Steorn is grabbing the spotlight on that these days anyway. Technical difficulties. HA!). But from an environmental point of view, as closed-cycle as possible (regarding the materials used), with the energy input being "green," is desireable.
YT2095 Posted July 7, 2007 Posted July 7, 2007 well the "Exhaust" product is only what you`d eventually get anyway if the Alu was left to "rot" in a landfill somewhere, but tin foil from a baked potato or pie or beer cans etc... could make a tremendous amount of energy that would otherwise be lost and wasted. how many drink a beer while watching the football, that beer can could power that TV with ease! now THERE`S an Incentive I have a smaller version in the Lab, that I feed beer can ring pulls, I get all the hydrogen I want on demand.
foofighter Posted July 7, 2007 Posted July 7, 2007 is perpetual motion ruled out by modern physics theories, like FTL travel is generally speaking, or might there be a way for Pmotion?
YT2095 Posted July 7, 2007 Posted July 7, 2007 it`s currently ruled out, and there`s little likelihood of it ever being ruled IN, unless we have cause to rewrite the basic laws of thermodynamics.
THX-1138 Posted July 12, 2007 Posted July 12, 2007 Which I've seen mnemonicised for the layman thusly: 1st law: You can't win. 2nd law: You can't break even. 3rd law: You can't even get out of the game.
insane_alien Posted July 13, 2007 Posted July 13, 2007 actually, you can theoretically break even. at 0K which is impossible to reach.
smarty_pants Posted July 13, 2007 Posted July 13, 2007 but what about in australia where we have a drought so we couldn't really waste water on cars
YT2095 Posted July 13, 2007 Posted July 13, 2007 you`de set up a series of monofilaments to catch drops of Dew overnight. you just can`t please some Folk!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now