Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As this deals with a bit of mysticism I have moved this thread to Speculations. Should the hypothesis prove a bit more mainstream than my cursory glance suggested, it will be moved back to one of the science subforums.

Posted

1. You can't defend any idea on either "a priori" or Ockhams' Razor. Ideas must be defended on the data. Does your idea give us the universe we observe?

 

2 Why do you have "Brahmin" in it at all? That's one reason Phi for All moved this.

 

3. If you really think this works, then write it up for arXiv.org and submit it. Otherwise, you are really wasting your time here. We aren't going to certify an idea involving physics unless the physics community looks at it.

Posted

Thank you Lucaspa for your comments.

Allow me to address them one by one.

 

1. I believe the data as we know today is in agreement with my Idea. Thiis includes string theory, quark theory, I even accounted for those pesky 8 dimensions enfolding to create 3 dimensional space. However I am an accounting professor and we rely on concepts and principles more than raw data.

 

2. I am a theist.

 

3. I appologize. I posted this on two sites both had "A THEORY OF EVERYTHING" in their title. Therefor I assumed this would be the spot to post it. But thankyou for the other site.

 

FinallyI thought it might be nice to share my Idea with others who may be interested. I'm sorry if I offended anybody

 

Best to all,

 

Pat

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.