Sayonara Posted September 19, 2002 Posted September 19, 2002 Why isn't there a mod assigned to this forum? We could have a fight to the death to determine who gets to rule it with an iron fist - winner takes all. In keeping with the theme of the forum all of the following would be allowed in the arena: Magic High technology Knowledge of the future Transdimensional shifting Metamorphosis Unexpected evolution Cannibalism
fafalone Posted September 19, 2002 Posted September 19, 2002 Any forums without a moderator are moderated by me and blike. Personally, I don't see why anyone besides Zarkov, or someone who wanted to delete/edit Zarkov's posts, would want to moderate pseudoscience
blike Posted September 19, 2002 Posted September 19, 2002 MEE!! PICK ME!!! Faf, your humor detector is broken. Please see a shop near you and have it replaced as soon as possible.
Sayonara Posted September 19, 2002 Author Posted September 19, 2002 Originally posted by blike Faf, your humor detector is broken. :haha: And it's not like I didn't announce it at the top of the page either. Go faf go!
aman Posted September 20, 2002 Posted September 20, 2002 I vote for Sayonara, and Blike, and Faf. And anybody else who wants the job. I want it but I'm too old and can't be around consistant. I just like being around. I guess that doesn't help much but that's my job.:zzz: :zzz: :zzz: Anybody new got a handle on psuedoscience? Just aman
Sayonara Posted September 21, 2002 Author Posted September 21, 2002 Vote? VOTE? What is this, a democracy?!? How can you possibly expect to resolve this without a violent bloodbath?
Zarkov Posted September 23, 2002 Posted September 23, 2002 What's this, mmm, strange ? "I don't see why anyone besides Zarkov, or someone who wanted to delete/edit Zarkov's posts" Well someone likes me!!! :)
Radical Edward Posted September 23, 2002 Posted September 23, 2002 Originally posted by Zarkov What's this, mmm, strange ? "I don't see why anyone besides Zarkov, or someone who wanted to delete/edit Zarkov's posts" Well someone likes me!!! :) he means that only people who would want to moderte or edit your posts would want to moderate pseudoscience. are you sure you speak English?
Zarkov Posted September 23, 2002 Posted September 23, 2002 I'm Tasmanian Mate, we speak english here. Only trouble is I can't read!!! Oh and I forgot, this is my reference ! You can't do basic algebra. You can't spell well. You don't know basic biology. -These contradict the very way you claim to have arrived at your conclusions. None of your evidence has come from reputable sources. You refuse to address the many flaws I and other have pointed out. You presume all the laws that contradict you are wrong. Your observations are not only taken in the wrong way, some of them are flat out wrong. You refuse to acknowledge all obseravable phenonemons that violate your theories. Your theories are WRONG. There's no need to debate this any more. Hope that explains everything :)
fafalone Posted September 23, 2002 Posted September 23, 2002 That about covers it. You went a whole week without posting, was I wrong to get my hopes up about you finally realizing your theories were fallacies?
Zarkov Posted September 23, 2002 Posted September 23, 2002 Actually Fafalone, I have a paper at Nature, being considered, that proves all the planets / moons are ejected from the Sun. Cool eh!!! :)
fafalone Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 I think I speak for everyone here when I say BULLSHIT. And if it's not bullshit and you actually sent your crap to Nature, you're wasting their time. Why don't you upload your article here? Obviously this so-called article is in ready to publish format, and you know many of the people on this site have access to Nature, so make with the article. E-mail to me or blike, post it in the articles section, or put it in a thread on the boards. This is the point where you stop making excuses for not sharing your work.
blike Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 Calm down faf, if it gets published, we'll all be eating our shorts. No need to call it bullshit. Its good that he's at least organizing his thoughts into papers. Zarkov, like faf said, if it doesn't get published, put it somewhere where we can read it. Take it easy guys.
fafalone Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 To even give the slightest bit of credence to the idea he's actually publishing in Nature is a travesty of intellect.
Zarkov Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 I can not publish until I am allowed to republish, it Nature accepts it. I can pass on a copy, for appraisal only. I still maintain copyright!! Oh it doesn't take much intellect to stumble onto little diamonds, when you sift through bullshit, sometimes it is amazing what is right under your nose. You just have to learn not to point your nose too high to the sky :)
aman Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 Nature should have a website to make all the info available about a month after the magazine comes out. I'm looking forward to it. Give em hell Zarkov. Just aman
Zarkov Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 You know me Aman, I will certainly raise a lot of blood pressures :)
Zarkov Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 Edited reply :- Hello Macmillan Magazines Limited, Nature - Electronic Submissions with Site ID: 1337501 Administrator, A WAM!NET® Internet Gateway package is being delivered to: Macmillan Magazines Limited, Nature Esubmission (SITEID: 2403601) Tracking ID: 1337501-21555 Job ID: Caley Client ID: Caley Job Ticket: Original Submission to Nature Number Of Files: 1 Size: 17.1KB ----------- What follows is the information from the Original Submission to Nature Job Ticket Submission*: Category = Astronomy IntendedFormat = Article TitleOfSubmission = The Angular momentum of the Solar System is closed. Angular Velocity of Planetary Orbits Obey a Power Law. FirstParagraph = The total angular momentum of the Universe is conserved. This is beautifully demonstrated in our own Solar System. The Angular Momentum of an orbiting body is equal to the Centripetal force = m r w^2 .................(1) so m r w^2 = K .................(2) and therefore r w^2 = K / m .................(3) = Guniversal (Newton's Gravitational Constant ) .................(4) so for any system with the same central mass rw^2 = Gcentral mass .................(5) Covering Letter: CoverLetter = This article demonstrates that the planets are in a 2^n order with respect to angular velocity. Newtons Universal Gravitational Constant is shown to be equivalent to angular momentum. Thank You, WAM!NET® Internet Gateway Notification Agent **** Please Do Not Respond To This Message **** For Technical assistance, please e-mail support@wamnet.com or visit http://support.wamnet.com $BANNER_AD
fafalone Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 And conservation of angular momentum points to the velocity of planets increasing, which would be required to break orbit away from the sun which you claimed?
fafalone Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 If you posted it here, you would maintain full copyrights. As per our policy, all article submissions and special cases rights are retained by the author. On another note... not only that, but believe me when I say we wouldn't even want to take credit for it, if that's what you're thinking.
Zarkov Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 Thats correct Fafalone, the planets must be spiralling out under some force, maybe solar wind, or the initial radial ejection force. I will post it here, but I have to enter into an agreement with Nature, that I give them the copyright! and I can only reproduce it with their permission, which they usually give. The insist of publishing first, then when it's old news I am basically free to do with it as I will, but only with their permission. I don't like this , but if they publish they have a wide readership. It is the way of the world nowdays. :)
Sayonara Posted September 24, 2002 Author Posted September 24, 2002 This is all very nice but it isn't getting us any closer to the aforementioned bloodbath. ps - let us know if they decide to run the article Zarkov!
fafalone Posted September 24, 2002 Posted September 24, 2002 Or the planets could not be spiralling outside their normal orbit... which is what the evidence suggests.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now