Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

BEFORE YOU READ: turns out it was posssibly a false alarm, you may disregard.

 

With the series u_{n+1}=u_{n} - \frac{{u_n}^2 - 2}{2 u_n }

Taking u_0 to be 3/2

We get the series

3/2

17/12

577/408

 

I was working them out by hand (my calculator isn't sociable with fractions that require many digits) so only got that far before I got bored or something. I had these numbers in my MSN screen name without explanation so someone tried to guess the pattern.

 

He saw it as:

 

Where u_n = \frac{p}{q} where p and q are integers. u_{n+1}=\frac{(2p)p - 1}{(2pq)}.

 

Now working with the idea that in maths, co-incidences are pretty damn rare, why are these two distinctive (looking) algorithms behaving exactly the same?

Posted

Let u_n= \frac{p}{q} in your first formula:

\frac{p}{q}-\frac{\frac{p^2}{q^2}-2}{\frac{2p}{q}}

Multiply numerator and denominator of the second fraction by q

\frac{p}{q}- \frac{\frac{p^2}{q}-2q}{2p}

Get common denominator 2pq

\frac{2p^2}{2pq}- \frac{p^2- 2q^2}{2pq}

and combine fractions

\frac{p^2+2q^2}{2pq}

 

The denominator of that is exactly the same the other form

\frac{2p^2-1}{2pq}

so they will be the same as long as the starting values satisfy

p^2+ 2q^2= 2p^2- 1

That is the same as 2q^2= p^2-1 which happens to be true for p/q= 3/2.

Posted

Ah, funky. I couldn't think why they would match generally, but matching only in that case makes a lot more sense, thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.