allmee Posted July 24, 2007 Posted July 24, 2007 I have designed a new device. http://unlimitedenergy.i8.com/ Please keep comments on the power enhancer.
Klaynos Posted July 24, 2007 Posted July 24, 2007 Your device will have a lower energy output than input due to friction. There's no way you could get more energy out. And your NDA is rubbish.
allmee Posted July 28, 2007 Author Posted July 28, 2007 http://img532.imageshack.us/flvplayer.swf?f=T11843178ir5 No NDA. Comments are welcome.
Sayonara Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 Clicking on your link triggered a VBScript malware/worm alert on my computer, and the connection was aborted. Any particular reason for that?
allmee Posted July 28, 2007 Author Posted July 28, 2007 The top is powered by hand, motor. The bottom should cancel any torque placed on it
lucaspa Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 The top is powered by hand, motor.The bottom should cancel any torque placed on it So? It looks to me like a double hand mixer. Before the days when there were electric hand held kitchen mixers, there were machines where you turned a crank, and the gears transferred the motion to turning the paddles on the mixer. Try going to an antique store to find one. This simply looks like two of those placed back to back. What's the big deal?
Klaynos Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/517OduveWCL._SS500_.jpg
lucaspa Posted July 28, 2007 Posted July 28, 2007 http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/517OduveWCL._SS500_.jpg Thank you. Yes, that's what the "power enhancer" reminds me of. Instead of a gear that leads directly to the blades, put in a long shaft that leads to the gears and you have half a power enhancer.
allmee Posted July 29, 2007 Author Posted July 29, 2007 http://img532.imageshack.us/my.php?image=powerenhancerno4vs6.flv Different but the same.
John Cuthber Posted July 29, 2007 Posted July 29, 2007 In what sense do you think this enhances power? As far as I can see it just uses a bunch gears (rather more than neccessary) to transfer rotation from the handle to the bottom shaft. So what? A simple shaft and bevel gear would do a better job.
allmee Posted July 29, 2007 Author Posted July 29, 2007 When you try to place torque on the bottom it will cancel it all out, study the animation any torque will push up the yellow and black rods, with the green and red gears turning in different directions equaly the blue gear will cancel it out. try makeing a model to test it.
John Cuthber Posted July 29, 2007 Posted July 29, 2007 Sorry to have to tell you allmee, but there's no way this is ever going to work. If it did then you could connect the output back to the input and have a perpetual motion machine. Perpetual motion machines don't work so your machine doesn't.
Klaynos Posted August 15, 2007 Posted August 15, 2007 Massive energy losses due to friction, you will lose energy not gain it!
Klaynos Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 You say that a 50HP motor will produce much more when it's put through this sytem. Please mathematically explain how you got to this as as I see it, it'll lose energy... Which it will...
John Cuthber Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 Allmee, did you not understand my explanation that this does not, and can not, work?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now