iNow Posted January 30, 2008 Posted January 30, 2008 Yeah... I missed the decimal. I know how to calculate a fu(king percentage, shade.
thedarkshade Posted February 3, 2008 Posted February 3, 2008 So what's your impression for the forum CrazCo? Honestly>!
CrazCo Posted February 3, 2008 Posted February 3, 2008 So what's your impression for the forum CrazCo? Honestly>! Haha, it's very helpful/interesting. I liiiiiiikkkke it.
falcon9393 Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 hmmm well it seems us girls are out numbered!
thedarkshade Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 hmmm well it seems us girls are out numbered! I'd say in a qualitative way!
thedarkshade Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 ....what? There is a small of females here, but who can do good science and have a sense of what's going on! Just back'em up man> ! edit: 0.06829% of all members have voted! Sharp!
CrazCo Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 hmmm well it seems us girls are out numbered! lol there aren't many forums where we are not!
thedarkshade Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 lol there aren't many forums where we are not!And I'd really like to know why is that?
Paralith Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 Hmm. I think women in general tend to prefer more personal interactions. There is also a general computer sufficiency bias that leans in the males' direction, for various sociocultural reasons, that probably discourages a decent amount of women from in-depth internet forays. These differences will diminish as time goes on, though, and internet interactions become an increasingly important part of people's lives in general. This forum in particular is also fairly representative of women in science in general. There are simply more men in the field. For now.
CharonY Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 Depends on level and department/field, I'd say.
falcon9393 Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 I'd say in a qualitative way! lol so i take it women in science are a good thing?
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted February 28, 2008 Posted February 28, 2008 Hmm. I think women in general tend to prefer more personal interactions. There is also a general computer sufficiency bias that leans in the males' direction, for various sociocultural reasons, that probably discourages a decent amount of women from in-depth internet forays. These differences will diminish as time goes on, though, and internet interactions become an increasingly important part of people's lives in general. This forum in particular is also fairly representative of women in science in general. There are simply more men in the field. For now. I'd also say that because of the current male bias, there are greater barriers of entry for women on the Internet -- too many nerdy guys fawning over them. http://xkcd.com/322/
thedarkshade Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 lol so i take it women in science are a good thing? That is what I meant to say:D
Mr Skeptic Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 YY here!!! Is that possible? No. X has critical development genes, and you can't do without. XYY is certainly possible though.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now