Reaper Posted August 17, 2007 Author Posted August 17, 2007 1/10 ratio. Well, I would guess more like 1 to 8. The point I'm trying to make is that you don't have to be a scientist to be interested in science. I agree. I'm just a mere college freshman....
swansont Posted August 17, 2007 Posted August 17, 2007 at my previous university there were more female majors than male. I didn't even know you could major in either of those. I was a physics major.
Dr.Evil Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Mabey the girls are pretending to be guys so they don't get PMs from us geeky guys.
Paralith Posted January 22, 2008 Posted January 22, 2008 Female, with a paying job in biomedical research, and applying to get a PhD in animal behavior. And to stave off those PMs, I'm already taken.
carol Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 girl here. i rarely post and i have encountered this thread just now while browsing through the other thread.
thedarkshade Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 Happy to see the percentage ! And I've started to think that iNow is a female:rolleyes:...
iNow Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 Happy to see the percentage ! And I've started to think that iNow is a female:rolleyes:... I'm going to cry myself to sleep tonight. There will surely be tears in my pillow.
Phi for All Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 And I've started to think that iNow is a female:rolleyes:...Is this thinking wishful or did she let something slip?
thedarkshade Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 ...did she let something slip? No, just that the style is girlish. Is it really a she? Damn, I knew it>>!
iNow Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 No, just that the style is girlish. You must not be familiar with too many females.
Phi for All Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 No, just that the style is girlish.Oh, I know what you mean. Too many adjectives. She paints pretty pictures in my head and I just want it to STOP!Is it really a she? Damn, I knew it>>!She has to be. No guy could possibly know so many different things.You must not be familiar with too many females. You must not be familiar with too many stalkers. How do you feel about having your writing style called girlish? What does that even mean? It's not like the computer dots the "i" with a little heart or anything. Is it girlish to use effective words to communicate your thoughts? While you're fleshing out your thinking and your readers are thinking about your flesh, are you concerned that a well-turned phrase may make you seem girlish? I get this too so I'm curious how you handle it.
thedarkshade Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 Oh, I know what you mean. Too many adjectives. She paints pretty pictures in my head and I just want it to STOP! Bull's eye! She has to be. No guy could possibly know so many different things. That's racism toward men:mad: !
iNow Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 That's racism toward men:mad: ! Ummm... it's called "sexism," darlin'. How do you feel about having your writing style called girlish? What does that even mean? It's not like the computer dots the "i" with a little heart or anything. Is it girlish to use effective words to communicate your thoughts? While you're fleshing out your thinking and your readers are thinking about your flesh, are you concerned that a well-turned phrase may make you seem girlish? I get this too so I'm curious how you handle it. I take it as a compliment. I can't see how someone telling me that I articulate my thoughts clearly and coherently could be a bad thing. Further, if I am able to communicate well like many females, my chances of bringing them home to fornicate are that much better. Don't get me wrong. I'll club the occasional baby momma over the head with a big stick and drag her back to my cave, but the sex tends to be better when they are there by choice after a few "well turned" phrases from me.
thedarkshade Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 Ummm... it's called "sexism," darlin'. OUR SEX DOES NOT SET OUT INTELLIGENCE! Just fooling around! You're a llegi iNow. Cheers!
Phi for All Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 You're a llegi iNow.Does this mean he's exempt from military service? Further, if I am able to communicate well like many females, my chances of bringing them home to fornicate are that much better.So basically you're just using what evolution has groomed you to use, right? You have no fancy feather ruff or plumage so you use colorful words to ensure that your jeans come off and your genes move on.
iNow Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 In actuality, I have lots of physical attributes akin to plumage and feather ruff... The cunning linguistic abilities are just icing on that proverbial cake. Best of both worlds, really.
thedarkshade Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 Does this mean he's exempt from military service? Nah, me and some friends of mine have this weird habit of calling bright, smart and friendly people llegi. It's just a short way to say legend. (in my country only the coolest one are called llegi)! I'm a llegi too, although I'm a nerdish bastard! edit: 0.5299% of all members have voted. Hmmm, is that enough to get a conclusion?
iNow Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 edit: 0.5299% of all members have voted. Are you saying that SFN only has 94 members? (50 total have voted in this thread as of the time of this post).
thedarkshade Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 Are you saying that SFN only has 94 members? (50 total have voted in this thread as of the time of this post). Look, SFN has 9435 members. From all of them 50 have voted here. Not you do this: [math]perc=\frac{50}{9435}\times 100=0.005299 \times 100=0.5299[/math] This is how you find percentage!
Phi for All Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 Are you saying that SFN only has 94 members? (50 total have voted in this thread as of the time of this post).You're missing the point.
thedarkshade Posted January 29, 2008 Posted January 29, 2008 I believe there is a difference between 5 and 0.5, or am I wrong?
DrDNA Posted January 30, 2008 Posted January 30, 2008 edit: 0.5299% of all members have voted. Hmmm, is that enough to get a conclusion? It's actually greater than the statistical significance of the New Hampshire primary.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now