Martin Posted August 6, 2007 Posted August 6, 2007 Here is the interview: http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/08/garrett-lisis-inspiration.html here is some background provided as a footnote http://interstice.com/~aglisi/Physics/CV.html Garrett Lisi is a wandering surfer-physicist, working on nomothetic unification while searching for the perfect wave. After graduating UCLA at the top of his class and getting his Ph.D. from UC San Diego, Garrett took off for Maui to windsurf and do physics on his own. Last year Garrett won a research grant from http://www.fqxi.org/ FQXi, which he spent on food, a laptop, and a new snowboard. His work on unifying general relativity and the standard model as an E8 principal bundle was featured as a recent http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week253.html This Week's Find by John Baez . Impatient with the slow progress of technology, Garrett has been manually uploading his brain to the web as an open-source theoretical research wiki: http://deferentialgeometry.org/ Deferential Geometry. He also blogs occasionally at http://www.fqxi.org/community/blogs.php FQXi blogs and has a semi-secret personal journal. Garrett recently presented his work at conferences in http://www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/loops07/ Mexico and http://interstice.com/~aglisi/albums/Iceland/Iceland.html Iceland, is currently hopping around California, and is looking forward to visiting the Perimeter Institute in October. ==endquote==
BenTheMan Posted August 10, 2007 Posted August 10, 2007 I remember asking a question about the conformal transformations for pure gauge Yang Mills theory in four dimensions on another forum---I had worked out an answer that couldn't be correct, and this guy (Garrett) answered with just one line: [math]F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} = F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}g^{\alpha\mu}g^{\beta\nu}[/math]. I felt pretty foolish because this statement should be completely obvious.
Martin Posted August 10, 2007 Author Posted August 10, 2007 I remember asking a question about the conformal transformations for pure gauge Yang Mills theory in four dimensions on another forum---I had worked out an answer that couldn't be correct, and this guy (Garrett) answered with just one line: [math]F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} = F_{\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}g^{\alpha\mu}g^{\beta\nu}[/math]. ... very much to your credit to be engaging people of that caliber (on whatever forum) I hope he gets a prolonged stay at Perimeter where he will be visiting in October. Seems to be a very nice guy---capable and independent. BTW Garrett presented his work at the Loops 07 conference back in June and I may be able to get links to his slides and audio. (I already posted the slides and audio for the talk by Martin Reuter. It was a great conference, lot of new work.) I'll see... Yes, here are the slides http://www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/loops07/talks/2A/Lisi.pdf and here is the audio http://www.matmor.unam.mx/eventos/loops07/talks/2A/Lisi.mp3
BenTheMan Posted August 11, 2007 Posted August 11, 2007 very much to your credit to be engaging people of that caliber (on whatever forum) Very much to his credit that he answered such a stupid question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now