Sorry about this....conspiracy time!

[A Fool]

I apologize for bringing this sensitive issue to play especially if this topic has already been brought up:

 

Did we land on the moon? there is alot of speculation about it so i decided maybe it would be best if i ask the ones with brains. Apparently the counterevidence to us landing on the moon are, but not limited to:

 

-lack of blast crater under the LM

-lack of background noice from the rocket during decents while astronaughts talk

-pictures of different missions 5 miles appart with the exact same rock formations

-lack of rocket plume from LM in video when take off back to the shuttle

-the crosshairs in pics have some objects in front and some behind

-the whole sheilding issue through the Van Halen belts.

 

and the list goes on and on

Please shed some light

thanks

 

~Fool

[Klaynos]

I have a lecturer who finds this deeply offensive due to the massive amount of evidence that we did, and that people died trying to achieve it. Do your research on evidence FOR the moon landings, and then compare the two, you'll notice that all the decent reproducible evidence says that yep they landed all right....

 

http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/

 

Looks like a good read.

[John Cuthber]

"Van Halen belts"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_halen

'nuff said.

[swansont]

Most of those objections are really misunderstandings of some basic physics, combined with the unreasonable expectation that actions on the moon should be just like those on the earth. Guess what — the moon is different.

 

I think they've all been addressed, and just keep getting recycled for no good reason. Two places that will likely answer all of them:

 

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html

http://www.clavius.org/

[A Fool]

that cleared up pretty much everything thanks swansont.

 

~Fool