lfmorgan Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 The concept of charge as currently best defined is a math-coherent myth. In terms of detailed deterministic local event mechanics, it is a relative measure of the excess or deficit of binding elecrons between the two objects said to exhibit atraction or repulsion. An object with a realtive excess of binding electrons, A, placed next to an object B with a relative deficit, will have more electons pulsing in and out of it to mark energy state-- and depending on relative electron pulsing energy states, there is a naturally tendency to equalize. The energy state gradient at the general location in space-time determines the degree of electron exchange required for adjacency equilibrium. The typical atom is pulsing a huge number of elecrons in and out to mark energy state. In molecular visible matterm, there is an equilibrium of real time exchange of elecrons between adjacent atoms where by electron clsosed loop orbit paths may go around a number of atoms in an S curve or figure 8 patterns as required for the stablity of a given molecule as a spinning/vibrating volume of space time. All electrons comng from and going back to atoms must be assumed to communicate with the nuclei of the atoms involved. It is therefore proper to see that electrons sharing at the atomiv nucleus level is routinely present in large numbers-- for all visible matter formed of molecules, It iis the molecule that provides for instrumented measure of local pulse event energy state-- in terms of measured frequency of pulsing. The so called atomic spectra are really molecular sprectra where each distinct molecule must be bound as an emergent whole by two or more atoms --that are constantly emitting and absorbing the binding energy electrons per the energy state measure at the molecule level ---which energy state is measured direcly by frquency of pulsing, f. That is E = nhf, where the value of n is never measurement parsed. At the molecular pulse event level n = 1/h, to explain why f = E. If we let the electron have a constant mass of h grams and the minumum energy quantum be h ergs, then h-symmetry allows problematic (gross averaging) prediction but leaves us mechanicall blind at the single pulse event level---at which level we are hopelessly visually confused between mass and energy! For a completion of Einstein's theory where the concepts of charge and antimatter are not needed, go to http://disney.go.com
insane_alien Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 i've seen that site before and it was debunked. the OP never returned to discuss it. i'm searching for the thread now. PS. thanks alot swansont, i was just posting this in its origional location when you moved it, somehow crashed FF.
swansont Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 PS. thanks alot swansont, i was just posting this in its origional location when you moved it, somehow crashed FF. Sorry about that, but I'd hate to add any fuel to possible complaints about material being moved to speculations when other speculative material isn't.
insane_alien Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 don't worry about it man. just unlucky coincidence.
YT2095 Posted August 26, 2007 Posted August 26, 2007 offsite URL advertising without permission too, it`s been Changed
mooeypoo Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 offsite URL advertising without permission too, it`s been Changed roflmao I was *wondering* what the heck disney had to do with anything...
swansont Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 roflmao I was *wondering* what the heck disney had to do with anything... Yeah, that's more planetary science. Pluto, and whether it's a planet or a dog. Pretty goofy stuff.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now