Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

To be honest, I think all the superscripts in the problem here is making it harder to read rather than easier. Here is the problem stated wihout the use of superscript:

 

x^x^[a^(a+1)] = a.

 

I dont know. Use whichever seems easiest to look at. :)

Posted
Actually to solve x it would go:

 

x = (a^a+1Log(a)/Productlog[a^a+1Log(a)])^a^a-1

 

To be quite honest, I'm not sure what Productlog is. How does it relate ot Log or nl? And how did you arrive at this answer?

 

Suppose that a = 1/2. What would Productlog[a^a+1Log(a)] give as a result?

  • 10 months later...
Posted

wow, this problem seem to have some problem. "x^" cannot be followed by "[a^(a+1)]" I'm surprised, not even my super powerful mathematica 5.1 seems to slove it.

Posted

i think it would be preferable using LATEX.

 

This is what i get from banging in equation in Maple

 

[math]\exp[{\frac{\mbox{LambertW}(\ln(a)a^{a+1})}{a^{a+1}}][/math]

 

to dimshadow. maple gives this

 

[math]\frac{\ln(a)}{(a+1)\mbox{LambertW}(\frac{ln(a)}{a+1})}[/math]

 

i dont know LW function personally, but u can have a read about it at

 

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.