fredrik Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 I did a quick search but found mostly various speculations that the brain "seems to do quick FFT", and various _models of the brain_ using fourier transforms in the pattern recognition. I see the clear association there, but it's on the same level as nature. I am trying to understand this deeper and how it connects to a logical description that can be formalised. The fourier transform has interesting properties, for example the gaussian distribution (beeing central in probability theory) is self-dual and transforms to itself. The fourier transform of a gaussian distribution is also gaussian. However, the gaussian is not the only self-dual function under fourier transforms, but this is a hint, and an interesting note. I am sitting with my memory full of a set of distinguishable events and note a frequency distribution that is fluctuating. How can I make progress and learn? Can I somehow, use part of my memory to investigae a transformation of the fluctuations, and so to speak extract more information? I seek the transformation to use, that gives me maximum yield, given the constraints and NO PRIOR preferred symmetry of the deviations. Sometime like that... but I am still looking for formalise the question. I have a feeling that a selection will take place and the transformation which are "most fit" will ultimately come to dominate, given enough processing. Somehow this is a key question, I don't find it attractive to introduce a transformation without induction. The transformation must be self-induced at some level. /Fredrik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred56 Posted November 6, 2007 Author Share Posted November 6, 2007 Admittedly it seems difficult for our brain to objectivise itself. I would hazard that we simply haven't got enough data yet. What we can see is definitely interesting, even surprising, but we need to 'dissect' things a whole lot more. Much of the historical record comes from the study of malfunctioning or damaged brains -we're only starting to see more detail, more levels, and mapping different functional areas. The brain appears to be a multiple kind of structure (unlike, say, the liver which is fairly homogenous). I still think this particular NP-hard problem is waiting for the technology... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now