Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When you perform the expression n! (read "n factorial"), you multiply all the positive integers between one and n. They have to be positive, so n>0, but they also have to be integers, so you would think that factorial of a decimal is impossible.

 

However, when I put it into my computer's calculator, I do get a real answer. For example, .01! = 0.99432585119150603713532988870511..., and 2.1! = 2.1976202783924770541835645379483..., so there must be a way to perform a factorial of a decimal.

 

What is it? How do you do that?

Posted
The gamma function is the extension of the factorial to complex and real numbers.

It is an extension (admittedly the commonly-mentioned one, hence my guess).

Posted

Also, you should note that the Gamma function is not defined for any negative integer (I believe there are poles at each one of those points).

Posted

Can't say I understand what a factorial of a non-natural number would mean.

I always understood that the definition was the amount of ways to order n objects and any formula was merely a way of calculating that. And ways to order 2.5 distinct objects doesn't make much sense to me.

 

Although I guess I could have it very backwards.

Posted
Can't say I understand what a factorial of a non-natural number would mean.

I always understood that the definition was the amount of ways to order n objects and any formula was merely a way of calculating that. And ways to order 2.5 distinct objects doesn't make much sense to me.

 

Although I guess I could have it very backwards.

 

No, you are correct- the "factorial" is only defined for positive itegers. What others are saying here is that the "gamma function" has the property that it is identical to the factorial for positive integer values of the argument but is defined for other numbers as well. (It is NOT defined for negative integers because the integral does not exist in that case.)

  • 15 years later...
Posted (edited)

In the 15 years since this thread was inactive good explanations have been added, for example, in youtube:

 

Edited by Genady
  • 5 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/6/2023 at 12:22 PM, Gyana Ranjan Nayak said:

This calculation seems to be correct.

Just in case anybody's interested, and because this thread has recently been revived, there's another definition that overlaps with that of a factorial (or gamma function). Namely, the falling and rising factorials.

Although it's a generalisation in a different sense. The variable is not the "n" in n!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.