Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

why not post it here instead of continually linking to your own site.

 

also, if you used the search function you would find that we have been over this several times.

Posted
Is the definition of 2 not that it is always 1+1?

 

Not always; in an axiomatic definition of the integers, you can prove that; it is defined in that case as the least integer greater than 1.

=Uncool-

Posted
And in what system is that not DEFINED as 2?

2 is sometimes defined as 1+1, and sometimes as the successor of 1. The two must be proven equivalent. Otherwise, I don't think I understand your question...

=Uncool-

Posted
Is the definition of 2 not that it is always 1+1?

Yes, it's a definition. But it might be necessary to verify that definition is well-defined. Otherwise we could define 1+1=3 (it's obviously not well-defined, though.)

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I don't understand why one would assume 1 and 1 wont equal 2. If you have 1 apple and 1 plum, you have 2 fruits. I don't know.. maybe I'm overlooking something obvious.

Btw this is my first post so Hello SFN!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.