ed84c Posted February 25, 2004 Posted February 25, 2004 Can you give me suggestions of the scientific inaccuracies in frankenstien?
blike Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 lol. uh, taking dead tissue and bringing it to life would be a good start....
fafalone Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 Actually that's already been accomplished if you count frozen as dead.
JaKiri Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 fafalone said in post # :Actually that's already been accomplished if you count frozen as dead. How about we count dead as dead?
Cheetah Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 Wouldn't a brain transplant be succesful if you just managed to connect all the nerves in the spine to the brain? And the body didn't reject the new brain of course.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 And if the brain didn't reject the body... Plus, there are blood vessels and keeping the brain from dying on you before it gets in.
fafalone Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 MrL_JaKiri said in post # : How about we count dead as dead? Then define dead.
Sayonara Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1308732.stm
Pinch Paxton Posted February 27, 2004 Posted February 27, 2004 I don't think that anything in the film is impossible, just that there would be better ways to achieve the same thing. Pincho.
Glider Posted February 29, 2004 Posted February 29, 2004 Yep. It only takes about four minutes without oxygen to do irreparable damage (longer with cooling).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now