Royston Posted January 10, 2008 Posted January 10, 2008 Have you been watching 'Atom' YT ? 'Shall I refuse my dinner because I do not fully understand the process of digestion?' Oliver Heaviside Edit: YT2095: Yes indeed I have, second time now, I love that stuff
smarty_pants Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 "Imagination is more important than knowledge" Albert Einstein
Severian Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 "All of physics is either impossible or trivial. It is impossible until you understand it, and then it becomes trivial." Ernest Rutherford “The supreme function of reason is to show man that some things are beyond reason” Blaise Pascal
Trilobite Posted January 15, 2008 Posted January 15, 2008 "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved." ~ Charles Darwin, Origin of Species
iNow Posted January 15, 2008 Posted January 15, 2008 "What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning." ~Werner Heisenberg
DrDNA Posted January 15, 2008 Posted January 15, 2008 "Let us suppose that an ichthyologist is exploring the life of the ocean. He casts a net into the water and brings up a fishy assortment. Surveying his catch, he proceeds in the usual manner of a scientist to systematise what it reveals. He arrives at two generalisations: (1) No sea-creature is less than two inches long. (2) All sea-creatures have gills. These are both true of his catch, and he assumes tentatively that they will remain true however often he repeats it. In applying this analogy, the catch stands for the body of knowledge which constitutes physical science, and the net for the sensory and intellectual equipment which we use in obtaining it. The casting of the net corresponds to observation; for knowledge which has not been or could not be obtained by observation is not admitted into physical science. An onlooker may object that the first generalisation is wrong. "There are plenty of sea-creatures under two inches long, only your net is not adapted to catch them." The icthyologist dismisses this objection contemptuously. "Anything uncatchable by my net is ipso facto outside the scope of icthyological knowledge. In short, "what my net can't catch isn't fish." Or--to translate the analogy--"If you are not simply guessing, you are claiming a knowledge of the physical universe discovered in some other way than by the methods of physical science, and admittedly unverifiable by such methods. You are a metaphysician. Bah!" Sir Arthur Eddington (1882-1944)
bascule Posted January 18, 2008 Author Posted January 18, 2008 "Our clocks do not measure time. No, time is defined to be what our clocks measure." -- Seth Lloyd
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now