Jump to content

Referens not local realistic interpretations of a quantum mechanics are necessary.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Theme:

I write article on local, realistic interpretation of a quantum mechanics which compatible to Bell's inequality violation. Therefore I want to understand known not local realistic interpretations of a quantum mechanics.

Prompt please references on them (from internet). I would not like deeply to press in a detail (for example, mathematical). But only it would be desirable to understand an Bell's inequality vaolation explaination in these interpretations . So that about it was told briefly, clearly, is accessible, on "physical language".

 

Thank.

  • 3 months later...
Posted
Theme:

I write article on local' date=' realistic interpretation of a quantum mechanics which compatible to Bell's inequality violation. Therefore I want to understand known not local realistic interpretations of a quantum mechanics.

Prompt please references on them (from internet). I would not like deeply to press in a detail (for example, mathematical). But only it would be desirable to understand an Bell's inequality vaolation explaination in these interpretations . So that about it was told briefly, clearly, is accessible, on "physical language".

 

Thank.[/quote']

I can suggest the book, a collection of papers by JS Bell "Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics", all on the question of locality/nonlocality. AS I understand Bell's inequality, is that local hidden variables will not work as Quantum Mechanical parameters. Only hidden nonlocal variables are of any physical value.

 

Local hidden variables run into problems in the Clauser/Aspect experiments where measuring the polarization of one photon immediately affects the same component of polarization of a twin photon moving in the opposite direction that may be light years away. The effect is immediate. Do you see why "local hidden variables" wont work here? I am not saying your theory is wrong, I am just saying what the current thinking on the matter is.

 

Browse the net (google) for "nonlocality Bell clauser Aspect EPR". You will eventually find some thing you can use.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.