Pangloss Posted December 8, 2007 Author Posted December 8, 2007 You're a fine one to talk about diversions when it's the entire purpose of your argument, splitting hairs over the definition of "liberal"! You keep saying that I haven't proven that he's a social liberal, and yet that's exactly what I did in pointing out that he's recreated their welfare state. You call that exclusively economic, I say that's bogus -- there's a social design component to welfare. You say tomayto, I say tomahto. Some liberals are supporting Chavez, big deal. End of discussion, right there. You even get the last word. Bravo.
bombus Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 I can't wait to hear what all the Hollywood types who've been to visit Chavez think of all this. According to Bill O'Reilly, more Hollywood stars have been to visit Hugo Chavez than have been to visit the troops in Afghanistan. Take that, Sean Penn, you freaking moron.[/ Can you blame them!? Afghanistan is dangerous! Oh, and I'd call Chavez a socialist rather than a liberal (wtf does that really mean anyway?) Chavez is great! Long may he rein.
Reaper Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 Oh, and I'd call Chavez a socialist rather than a liberal (wtf does that really mean anyway?) It has about the same meaning as "conservative".
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now