Snoggums Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 Why is blue shift not called violet shift? I never got the reason, I realize it's possible that there is no reason other then it's easier to say, but I would love a solid answer. Red and violet are at opposite ends of the visible light spectrum, it would make sense to call it violet shift instead of blue shift. Now here's where you make me feel like an idiot because I'm worrying about such a trivial thing.
iNow Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 What an interesting question. Why don't we call it gamma shift? Probably has something to do with blue being a more prominent color in the visual area of the electromagnetic question, but I'm really not sure. Probably has everything to do with the first person who published a paper about the "increase in frequency" resulting from motion relative to an observer, and what they thought. I'm just not sure, though.
swansont Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 Blue is a primary color, and more manly. Seriously, though, I think it's more from narrowing the choices to red-green-blue, rather than ROYGBIV.
MrMongoose Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 Also, blue is one syllable and physicists are lazy.
Dark matter Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 Maybe because astronomers like to discriminate against purple. Or maybe, they don't think violet looks good on them.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now