K!! Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Have you people considered to design a LaTeX button which generates [math][/math] tags instantly without writtin'em?
ydoaPs Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 If you're going to type out the rest of the symbols, why use a button for the [math] [/math] tags?
ydoaPs Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 We don't have \lambda, \infty, \nabla, etc buttons, so why would we need a button for [math] [/math] tags?
K!! Posted January 2, 2008 Author Posted January 2, 2008 It is for save time. It's quickly when you're helpin' someone to solve a problem. (I'm not askin' to set all symbols, it's enough by settin' [math][/math] tags.)
ecoli Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 yeah, but yourdad's point is that if you're typing out all this math anyway, what difference does one more, relatively small tag make? Although, I don't think it's a bad idea, in principle.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 I'll poke around in vB and see if I can get that to work.
K!! Posted January 2, 2008 Author Posted January 2, 2008 Thanks for considering my suggestion Cap'n Refsmmat
Mr Skeptic Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 It would be useful to have a math mode, but it would probably be more useful for learning than for writing. In any case, it would be disproportionate to the amount of space the text editing buttons take up.
K!! Posted January 2, 2008 Author Posted January 2, 2008 it would probably be more useful for learning than for writing. Yes, this is a good point. Is there a LaTeX manual designed? I can design one for new people.
ydoaPs Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Yes, this is a good point. Is there a LaTeX manual designed? I can design one for new people. http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/showthread.php?t=4236
iNow Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 It would be very cool to incorporate something like the following into the Advanced Reply window: http://test.izyba.com/equationeditor/equationeditor.php Though, I'm not sure how possible that is, nor what the consequences/challenges of such an implementation might be.
K!! Posted January 2, 2008 Author Posted January 2, 2008 Well, I'm not actually requesting that. I use MathType to type LaTeX codes, it's faster.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 It would be very cool to incorporate something like the following into the Advanced Reply window: http://test.izyba.com/equationeditor/equationeditor.php Though, I'm not sure how possible that is, nor what the consequences/challenges of such an implementation might be. Would there be any math folks that would use that? I presume most of them know LaTeX already. It's JavaScript, so it wouldn't be too hard to implement in vB.
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 Aha! http://pi.bloo.us:800/academic/latex/plugin/ That looks pretty cool. I'll see about getting it installed sometime.
timo Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 yeah, but yourdad's point is that if you're typing out all this math anyway, what difference does one more, relatively small tag make?The big difference I see is that \lambda, ... are TeX codes that a lot of people are familiar with while [ math], [/ math] are SFN-only tags. Other pages use different tags for enclosing TeX-code (e.g. [tex] on PF, <math> on WP). I often get the wrong tag, first.
Dak Posted January 5, 2008 Posted January 5, 2008 you could allways just set ^m to auto-insert the [maf][/maf] tags and plonk the cursor in the middle, like happens for ,, etc (^b, ^i, ^u respectively) btw, if you do could you also make ^q == quote tags please?
K!! Posted February 6, 2008 Author Posted February 6, 2008 Cap'n Refsmmat... so... aren't you gonna set the math button?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now