Realitycheck Posted January 16, 2008 Posted January 16, 2008 In this article, they are claiming that antimatter is produced when black holes gobble up stars. What I have trouble with is when they say that matter is formed by waves. As a black hole or neutron star destroys a star, tremendous amounts of radiation are released. Just as electrons and positrons emit the tell-tale gamma rays upon annihilation, so too can gamma rays combine to form electrons and positrons, providing the mechanism for the creation of the antimatter cloud, scientists think. http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20080111/sc_space/sourceofmysteriousantimatterfound
Mr Skeptic Posted January 16, 2008 Posted January 16, 2008 But how would the antimatter get separated from the matter?
Klaynos Posted January 16, 2008 Posted January 16, 2008 But how would the antimatter get separated from the matter? A large magnetic field will do that just fine.... I'm not sure about "combining" 2 gamma rays to create a matter - anti-matter pair, but I do know you can use photons of sufficient energy to create the pairs, the idea comes from vacuum fluctuations that these pairs are being created and annihilated all the time on very very short time scales, and they just need a "kick" to have longer lifespans....
swansont Posted January 16, 2008 Posted January 16, 2008 I think it's just an unfortunate use of the word "combine" by a reporter. Someone a little more science savvy would have asked/explained how the astronomers know this isn't primordial antimatter. edit: another story http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/09/theres-a-lopsided-halo-of-antimatter-surrounding-the-centre-of-the-milky-way/ and there was a comment I read elsewhere that claims that there were 511 keV photons that were actually redshifted a fair amount, indicating significant gravity, hence the supposition that a neutron star or black hole is involved.
Martin Posted January 16, 2008 Posted January 16, 2008 the best FREE article I've seen about this is here: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080109173722.htm the real article is in 10 January Nature magazine but I think it is pay-per-view the point is that the cloud of 511 keV emission coincides with a region found to contain a lot of hard X-ray binaries more specifically hard low-mass X-ray binaries the coincidence is circumstantial evidence that points the finger at the binaries being responsible somehow for the 511 keV. this would mean that somehow the binaries are producing positrons which then get annihilated resulting in 511 keV. a hard Xray binary means a binary star where one partner is a neutron star or black hole and is sucking in stuff from the other partner as gas from the big partner spirals in towards the compact object it reaches high speed and temperature and radiates hard X-ray but they don't understand how these abundant Xray binaries could be producing the positrons ================== this region in central Milky producing a lot of 511 keV has first been noticed in 1970 and it has been a longstanding mystery with many people offering many different explanations this new work doesnt PROVE anything, what it does is exhibit a COINCIDENCE that there are a lot of these Xraybinaries where the radiation is coming from----so that it would be reasonable to try to figure out could these Xraybinaries be making it, and maybe to discover a possible mechanism. ===================
Severian Posted January 16, 2008 Posted January 16, 2008 I think the word 'combine' is just fine in this context. Two photons annihilate to an electron-positron pair via a t-channel electron exchange. It is this diagram rotated by 90 degrees anticlockwise http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/59/ComptonScattering-s.svg You can't do it with one photon since it wouldn't conserve energy.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now