YT2095 Posted March 9, 2004 Share Posted March 9, 2004 there`s a quid riding on this! make a 3 by 3 grid a bit like a Xand O`s game. inthem are to be Whole numbers that along the lines must add up to 55, the same down the colums and on the diagonal, a bit like those magic squares. so far I can do 54. they MUST be whole numbers, but negative numbers or Zero are allowed too and you may use the same numbers twice if you want. HELP!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted March 10, 2004 Author Share Posted March 10, 2004 no takers??? well here`s what I have so far, I`ve used this a key and was trying to use offsets from this "Key" to make all be 55 Key: 8 1 6 3 5 7 4 9 2 all of these in any direction will add up to 15. I used an offset of 13 to make 54 the sum like so: 21 14 19 16 18 20 17 22 15 now if each had .333.. reoccuring it would be easy as would filling each square with 18.333... so I tried a different tactic, lets make one that starts with all making Zero: 3 -4 1 -2 0 2 -1 4 -3 all makes zero, so realy then we need to make each line add up to ONE and then use an offset of 54 (that we established in the 1`st equasion) here`s where I got: 4 -5 2 -3 1 3 -2 5 -4 all works great untill the bottom line ( NOW can anyone take it from here. I`m truly stuck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted March 10, 2004 Share Posted March 10, 2004 What is it u are looking for? A magic square with the numbers total 55 on the columns, rows and the two diagonals? Edit: What is the maximum number of times you can use a no.? Two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted March 10, 2004 Author Share Posted March 10, 2004 "What is it u are looking for? A magic square with the numbers total 55 on the columns, rows and the two diagonals?" yup that`s exactly it "Edit: What is the maximum number of times you can use a no.? Two?" there is no maximum, you can use the same number as many times as you like the only restriction is that it must be a Whole number, so non of this 0.1579 stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 Did un manage to find it? Is it solveable? cause i had a go at it, and i don' think it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted March 12, 2004 Author Share Posted March 12, 2004 nope not yet, and I`m not sure if it is or not tbh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 cause, i was having a look up on the net, i found 15, and it can't be multiplied to make 55 without getting a horrible decimal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 well, something that may help. This puzzle cannot be solved by using positive integers only. The closest u can get to the answer using positives is 54, then it is 57. Hope that helps! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted March 12, 2004 Author Share Posted March 12, 2004 yup, that`s about as far as I got too, the use of negatives seemed encouraging at 1`st, but the best I can get Zeros, then 3 and 6 etc... I think whatever the answer is must be either zero or a multiple of 3. it`s darned annoying! ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 where did u find this puzzle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted March 12, 2004 Author Share Posted March 12, 2004 I didn`t, a mate told me about it, I think he heard it on the radio or something like that, not 100% sure? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeoxyriboNucleicAcid Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 Off of the top of my head: 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 5 25 TRY TO REARRANGE THEM to make 55 on the 2 rowsthat don in this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YT2095 Posted March 12, 2004 Author Share Posted March 12, 2004 yeah, those diagonals will get ya every time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeoxyriboNucleicAcid Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 If you put your mindto it, you could probably come up with a simple leniar, or maybe quadratic equation to solve this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 DeoxyriboNucleicAcid said in post #:simple I don't think so! DeoxyriboNucleicAcid said in post #:leniar, or maybe quadratic equation to solve this. I think so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neurocomp2003 Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 Sol'n: Not Possible. if you can solve for 55 you can solve for 1 = [55-(3*18)] So lets solve for 1 start with the middle number a and let 0 denote unknown 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 now for 4 of the lines we have 0 a 0 = 1. Thus all four are of the form x a (1-x-a) = 1...let us choose x,y,z,w to represent each of the four lines. Therefore: (x) (y) (z) (1-w-a) (a) (w) (1-z-a) (1-y-a) (1-x-a) Thus the remaining four lines represent the edges of the box. [1] x+y+z = 1, [2] 3(1-a)-(x-y-z) = 1 [3] ............ [4] ........... now insert [1] into [2] : [2] --> 3(1-a)=2 ---> 1-a = 2/3---> a= 1/3 but a must be whole...UNSOLVABLE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeoxyriboNucleicAcid Posted March 12, 2004 Share Posted March 12, 2004 it could be more than one number, but that about sums it up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aommaster Posted March 13, 2004 Share Posted March 13, 2004 That's what i tohught as well, i tried to to it with 5, and then, multiply everything by 11 (is this the right approach?), and it couldn't work. I just couldn't get 11! You can get 15, but, as i said before, it gives u a horrible decimal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psi20 Posted March 13, 2004 Share Posted March 13, 2004 you keep on using this pattern 8 1 6 3 5 7 4 9 2 which makes it impossible to make 55 with whole numbers. if it is possible to make another magic square that adds up to 1 without the pattern 2ndhigh lowest 4thhighest 3rdlowest middle 3rdhighest 4thlowest highest 2ndhighest hey that's pretty neat looking at it with words instead of numbers. anyways, if you can make a magic square that adds to 1 without using the 8 1 6 3 5 7 4 9 2 pattern, you offset every number by 18 and that gives you 55. I'm not familiar with magic squares, but if there's only one specific type of square that generates a specific number, then it would be impossible. to neurocomp: "Thus all four are of the form x a (1-x-a) = 1...let us choose x,y,z,w to represent each of..." are you adding or multiplying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neurocomp2003 Posted March 13, 2004 Share Posted March 13, 2004 psi20 "Thus all four are of the form x a (1-x-a) = 1...let us choose x,y,z,w to represent each of..." are you adding or multiplying? Take a guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now