john5746 Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 That's the link I read. Is the Broken Window Fallacy (economic) saying that the logic in the Broken Window Theory (social) is fallacious? If so, I fail to see the correlation between the two. In fact, if this is the case, it would seem BW fallacy is a Strawman fallacy since BW theory has nothing to do with economics. I don't think the Broken Window Fallacy is trying to address the theory at all, but if it is then I agree with your assertion and it wasn't my intention at all.
Phi for All Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 That's right, and the determination of whether or not that was a good idea needs to be based on whether or not it WAS a good idea, not the fact that he was a Republican, the fact that he's had three heart attacks, the fact that he's a mean-spirited monster who eats small babies, or any of the other nonsense the far left spouts on a routine basis, couched as criticism of the no-bid process.Now I remember why I stopped posting in Politics. It was because of people placing these types of generalized assumptions on me based on a specific and particular opinion I held. I consider them an affront, and particularly hypocritical in your case, Pangloss, considering how you hate people ascribing motives and thoughts to you that you did NOT express.
Pangloss Posted February 7, 2008 Author Posted February 7, 2008 Now I remember why I stopped posting in Politics. It was because of people placing these types of generalized assumptions on me based on a specific and particular opinion I held. I consider them an affront, and particularly hypocritical in your case, Pangloss, considering how you hate people ascribing motives and thoughts to you that you did NOT express. I apologize if I read too much into what you were saying. It just struck me as being a little too ABB. I may be a jerk sometimes, but I'm damned well even-handed about it. I did exactly the same thing when people insisted that Bush "lied" about WMDs, and such is the case with the no-bid/cronyism accusations as well. I agree that the question transcends the domain of the Michael Moore and MoveOn.org crowd, but until there's actual evidence of cronyism, I won't tolerate it being called that here. But like you said earlier, you weren't complaining about cronyism, you were complaining about the larger issue of whether no-bid contracts are a good idea, so it was inappropriate for me to draw that conclusion.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now