Inja Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Something I can't quite grasp, How is it one can detect proteins in Western blot using antibodies, if the epitopes recognised by these antibodies have been denatured in the SDS-PAGE run beforehand? Are you just hoping that the epitopes are continuous or that they partially reform upon transfer to the membrane? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 why are you assuming the epitopes will be denatured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inja Posted March 16, 2008 Author Share Posted March 16, 2008 Is this not the purpose of the SDS-PAGE run before? To denture the protein and cover it in a uniform negative charge so that it migrates according to its mass, and then is not the protein used in the western blot subtracted directly from this same denatured sample? The epitopes would only not denature if they were continuous epitopes... Correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted March 16, 2008 Share Posted March 16, 2008 Well they don't really denature, in the sense that the residues of the protein break apart. SDS surround the proteins with negative ions, so that the proteins lose their unique tertiary structures. This could cause them to lose their functional activity, but they aren't degraded to a point where the target antibody can't bind to them. Note though, that even if a protein partially degrades, an antibody can still (potentially) bind to the protein, though it does depend on the antibody/protein. Also, the antibodies are probably less specific in their binding than you think. If you don't blot your membrane (and even if you don't) you'll get background 'noise' and possibly cross-reactive bands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inja Posted March 16, 2008 Author Share Posted March 16, 2008 Well of course the individual amino acids don't break apart, but I guess what your saying is that the protein only partially unfolds, leaving many discontinous structures intact. I had always pictured SDS-based denaturation as more of a chain reaction in which the penetration of one SDS molecule into the protiens hydrophobic core opened up gaps that allowed for further molecules to associate with the polypeptide and so forth until the protein was completely unwound. This was of concern to me since I have been instructed to detect a certain protein molecule by western blot, using a monoclonal antibody which I know recognises a discontinuous epitope... Thanks for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 Actually SDS treatment will have effects on the efficiency of subsequent antibody assays. In case of linear epitopes the binding efficiency might be enhanced. Discontinuous epitopes, however are a tricky matter. In most cases denaturing electrophoresis is not recommended in such cases. Sometimes it does work, possibly due to renaturation. I also believe that strong disulfide bonds can stabilize the epitopes, depending how close the involved aas are within the protein. So in short, Western blots are not really suited for most discontinuous epitopes. I actually recall there being a paper a year or so back in which surprisingly discontinuous epitopes were detected in Westerns. Maybe I can dig it up. Just to clarify a point though, the epitope to be detected is clearly a discontinuous one? Or has the AB just been initially raised against one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 CharonY - it sounded like the OP was asking if SDS caused continuous epitopes to become discontinuous. I don't think this happens, but maybe that's not what the OPer was asking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted March 20, 2008 Share Posted March 20, 2008 Actually to me this part here: Are you just hoping that the epitopes are continuous implied that the it was assumed that continuous epitopes are detectable but the question was what happens if it's not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inja Posted March 22, 2008 Author Share Posted March 22, 2008 Actually SDS treatment will have effects on the efficiency of subsequent antibody assays. In case of linear epitopes the binding efficiency might be enhanced. Discontinuous epitopes, however are a tricky matter. In most cases denaturing electrophoresis is not recommended in such cases. Sometimes it does work, possibly due to renaturation. I also believe that strong disulfide bonds can stabilize the epitopes, depending how close the involved aas are within the protein. So in short, Western blots are not really suited for most discontinuous epitopes. I actually recall there being a paper a year or so back in which surprisingly discontinuous epitopes were detected in Westerns. Maybe I can dig it up. Just to clarify a point though, the epitope to be detected is clearly a discontinuous one? Or has the AB just been initially raised against one? The epitope is indeed discontinuous, I read the paper you mentioned, I was just concerned as to being told to detect a discontinuous epitope using western blot following denaturing electrophoresis. Yes I am working on the assumption that although continuous epitopes are easily recognised, discontinuous ones are not. Thanks, I have my answer Perhaps I will post on other threads, or become a contributing member, but that depends on how much time I have as I expect to be quite busy in the lab for the next few months. ciao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r_bo_99 Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 I'm very weak in immunology, but when an antigen is encountered in vivo it is handled by the immune system in one of two different pathways: cross-linking or presentation by an APC (Antigen Presenting Cell). If your detecting antibody was derived from the latter pathway, then the protein had already been denatured by the APC when the antibodies were developed, therefore denaturing with SDS should be the same as denaturing by the APC. Bottom line: if your protein of interest is viral or self-protein, and the antibody was developed in a different species, then it should be recognized by the antibody, whether it is contiguous or not. Doesn't that seem correct? PS I have zero experience with Westerns, this is a conjecture on my part. Rock on, Randy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Actually you are right to consider how the antibodies were produced in the first place. It is e.g. a difference if the protein or only the relevant peptides were presented (or if the design was first done in silico). I assume that in this case the antibodies in question have never before been used in a Western? Of course one can try doing a non-denaturing gel, though the resolution would be rather bad. Anyway, APCs do not denature proteins (as antigens) in a similar way as SDS does, but they degrade it. So in the end they would present peptides. A discontinuous epitope of that antigen has to remain, per definitionem, intact. Otherwise it would not be an epitope, nor would it be considered discontinuous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now