Pangloss Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jfE8qUikNEG6MVWqYku2k8BD_RcgD8VG3QS80 Arthur C. Clarke, a visionary science fiction writer who won worldwide acclaim with more than 100 books on space, science and the future, died Wednesday in his adopted home of Sri Lanka, an aide said. He was 90. The last of the grand masters has passed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted March 18, 2008 Share Posted March 18, 2008 damn... I knew today felt weird. His passing must have sent a disturbance through the force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Skeptic Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 Too bad. I'm reading Rama III by him right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted March 19, 2008 Share Posted March 19, 2008 Wow. I'm glad he will still live on through his writing. Wow. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Pangloss. I may have missed it otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted March 19, 2008 Author Share Posted March 19, 2008 Too bad. I'm reading Rama III by him right now. Is it any good? The first one is one of my all-time favorites, but some of his later sequels, especially the ones "co-written" (read "ghost-written") by Gentry Lee were kinda lame. Too much human drama, not enough hard science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antimatter Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 I got the flu that day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gcol Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 Someone remind me when one his first came out, Childhoods End. Bought it in paperback when it was first published. Seems like a lifetime ago. More fantasy than science though, but with some fine imaginative descriptions of extraterestrial planetary topography and scenary. Oh, damn, perhaps it was C.S. Lewis..... memory fading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antimatter Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 2001 was excellent, I think I must've read that book at least three times. I never read Childhood's End though, I did see it in my library. The last of the grand masters has passed. What about Ray Bradbury? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecoli Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 What about Ray Bradbury? who happens to be coming to I-con in about two weeks... a sci-fi convention hosted by my university. Definitely getting an autograph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antimatter Posted March 24, 2008 Share Posted March 24, 2008 who happens to be coming to I-con in about two weeks... a sci-fi convention hosted by my university. Definitely getting an autograph. lucky... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pangloss Posted March 25, 2008 Author Share Posted March 25, 2008 There are a number of authors from the SFWA Grand Master list that are still around, and many of the old guard of first- or second-generation SF authors, but the old convention was that there were three grand masters in the first generation of SF authors -- Heinlein, Clarke and Asimov -- because each of those three had such a profound influence on the genre. The list was never considered thorough and it's always been recognized that it wasn't really fair, and the authors themselves often called it silly and pointless. I mainly mentioned it just because it's such a familiar cliche with people in my generation. I can't for the life of me remember where this unofficial bestowment originated from. John W. Campbell may be the culprit here -- I believe he published the first (or some of the first) stories of all three authors (in Astounding). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antimatter Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 I was never a huge fan of Heinlein, but Asimov is brilliant. The End of Eternity was one of my favorites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Skeptic Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Is it any good? The first one is one of my all-time favorites, but some of his later sequels, especially the ones "co-written" (read "ghost-written") by Gentry Lee were kinda lame. Too much human drama, not enough hard science. Well, Rama II had a psychopathic crew member, half the crew dead by the end of the series, shamans, magical drinks, prophesies, and if it had some actual science I didn't notice it. I don't mind human drama, but I could do without the magic part, which was not even part of the plot. Haven't finished the third one, but so far it doesn't have magic, but is again full of human drama. Also, I either missed a big chunk of the series (the first meeting with the Node), or the plot has been slice'n diced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now