Is this Wikipedia quote correct?

[Luminal]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network#Spiking_neural_networks

 

Spiking neural networks with axonal conduction delays exhibit polychronization, and hence could have a potentially unlimited memory capacity.

 

I've attempted to understand how polychronization via delays in the axons would allow for "potentially unlimited memory capacity" but I'm coming up with nothing here.

[D H]

"Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof". The proof of this extraordinary claim in this Wikipedia article: "citation needed".

[Mr Skeptic]

Lies. There is no such thing as unlimited, though "effectively unlimited" comes close.

[Luminal]

Yet what does it even mean? Memory through polychronization? I'm not following how polychronization could be used as memory storage in the first place, regardless of how much.