Mr Rayon Posted March 21, 2008 Posted March 21, 2008 While on another site reading an article on photographic memory. A simple question came to me. It was "can one improve one's memory without using some sort of trick to it?". For example, without using some sort of mnemonic. So, if one were to constantly memorise things...let's say definitions from a dictionary, will one's ability to remember in that specific way improve as a result of repetition? Or is our ability to memorise things based purely on genetics? Or is it a bit of both? BTW, I have heard that many people do not believe in the so-called photographic memory. Any theories, or ideas behind it? Soz, if the first question seems naive, anyway I'd love to hear any thoughts on these. Thanks.
r_bo_99 Posted March 22, 2008 Posted March 22, 2008 I've often wished I could improve my memory! Let me know what you find out. I haven't used them, but there are a couple software tools designed to help marshal your thoughts and ideas and put them in a format that allows you to make new, profound connections that you wouldn't have made otherwise. MindMaps is one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_map Sort of an artificial way of improving one's memory. Later, R.
Mr Rayon Posted March 27, 2008 Author Posted March 27, 2008 For r_bo_99 and anyone interested in improving memory, I found a good site where it briefly tells a reader about it (it also answered my question): http://www.helpguide.org/life/improving_memory.htm
valy Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 (edited) Why are you against mnemonics? I use a system of visual mnemonics, the Giordano memorization system with great success, you can have a visual synopsis of an entire book in your mind, with images representing every paragraph or information within pargraphs, if you want. The thing is that most mnemonics, except visual ones, are useless and with the visual mnemonics you still need to build a memory skill through training. It's like learning to write. But we need this to memorize textual information efectively. Our brains are not naturaly adapted to memorizing textual information any more than they are naturaly adapted to understanding it, it takes a skill wich is learned, and I think this is what keeps many peple from mastering memory techniques, they are not thought in school and most people don't dedicate the time to learn a skill outside of school. [[MOD NOTE: LINK REMOVED AS SPAM]] Edited January 22, 2009 by mooeypoo
Psycho Posted January 25, 2009 Posted January 25, 2009 I would like to know the science behind a photographic memory, although I have always presumed it wasn't actually photographic but just extremely good, I can remember most picture and diagrams fairly easily. Massive blocks of text are a lot harder and I would presume that I was fairly average so being able to remember a block of text would just be easier for other because of genetic factors, as well as the amount of practise they have had memorising things. They have probably just learned the skill and were naturally better at remembering in the first place the two really complement each other, if you can easily remember thing you are more likely to remember more about a particular item than another person because you have the ability too. 1
magi13 Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 People who have photographic memory have very good observation skills. Often times they rely on their senses. But we through memory training could achieve the same if not better. ^^, Mnemonics and rote memory really helps if you practice either often. What do you think about those who are autistic savants?
visceral Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 Don't they have massive amounts of wiring in one area which results in them having certain abilities, and not enough in other areas? Something like that...
cameron marical Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 what exactly is mnemonics or whatever? is it where you just convert everything you experience into pictures? if so, id have to say im against that, well, kind of. i think that focusing on just one way to memorize something is as unhealthy for mental processes as not doing any at all. you should do others, like try to remeber things by smell, or taste, or all at once. then i think is when you can see a greater mental capacatie and abilites. or just do something like new like walk around with your eyes closes like voltmans link suggests. the way it describes how it works really does seem benificial.
jimmydasaint Posted March 28, 2009 Posted March 28, 2009 Has anyone remembered by smell? I mean - has anyone used aromatherapy oils to associate smell with learning a topic or two. I would be interested in trying this out.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now