424319 Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 The main idea of new theory of time-space is that time is a expression of change in motion distance and curvature. In a word, time is equivalent to space, and vice versa. According this new theory of time-space, there are three kinds of clock. Those are current clock, thing clock and Doppler clock. Every clock has its own second unit. Time-space is moving. Active and passive motion of time-space form a whole world of physics. The new theory gives us a definite answer to what the nature of wave, light,gravity,energy,passive inertia, active inertia, electricity, magnetism, special and general Doppler principle is. Reference:THING AND ITS LAW (ISBN 1-58939-525-5), chapter 2: timedistance and timecurvature (the active and passive motion of time-space) and chapter 5: natural force(the durality of time-space and energy)published by Virtualbookworm.com publishing Inc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 We don't like duplicate threads. Please read the forum rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blike Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 According to the new theory of space and time, purple headphone wearing cows make time pass by mooing. Just because something says its so doesn't make it so. Evidence evidence evidence... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinch Paxton Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 Thing clock sounds a bit weak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atinymonkey Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 424319 said in post # :Reference:THING AND ITS LAW (ISBN 1-58939-525-5), chapter 2: timedistance and timecurvature (the active and passive motion of time-space) and chapter 5: natural force(the durality of time-space and energy)published by Virtualbookworm.com publishing Inc. SFA make my skin crawl but I don't know why. Pretentious, I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ms. DNA Posted March 19, 2004 Share Posted March 19, 2004 For what it's worth, Virtualbookworm.com is a print-on-demand publisher. It does both fiction and non-fiction; one of my friends published her novel through them. The author pays to have the book published (which is how the publisher makes money, not by actually selling books). I strongly doubt that the publisher was able to provide any sort of scientific peer review for this book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted April 3, 2004 Share Posted April 3, 2004 For what it's worth, Virtualbookworm.com is a print-on-demand publisher. It does both fiction and non-fiction; one of my friends published her novel through them. The author pays to have the book published (which is how the publisher makes money, not by actually selling books). I strongly doubt that the publisher was able to provide any sort of scientific peer review for this book. Which is why saying that "X has written N books on the topic of Y" gives a false sense of authority and expertise about X. Anybody, in principle, can write a book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted April 29, 2004 Share Posted April 29, 2004 How about you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted April 30, 2004 Share Posted April 30, 2004 How about you do? How about I do what? Write a book? I choose not to write a piece of scientific crap, just to prove the point, as I have some professional credibility to protect. I have a non-technical book registered with the US copyright office, so I know exactly how high that hurdle is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted May 1, 2004 Share Posted May 1, 2004 No, reply #8 was a response to bobg@y, whose puerile trolling has since been deleted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted May 2, 2004 Share Posted May 2, 2004 No, reply #8 was a response to bobg@y, whose puerile trolling has since been deleted. Ah, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now