Jump to content

Evolution - is it Challengable?


Recommended Posts

Seems to me that Darwin-type bio-evolutionary theory has no (scientific) theoretical opponents. None. Never has had.

 

I addressed this in post 18.

 

You were asked to clarify what you meant by "Darwin-type bio-evolutionary theory" because evolutionary theory has undergone significant changes and additions over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that Darwin-type bio-evolutionary theory has no (scientific) theoretical opponents. None. Never has had.

 

Yes, yes it has. That's been abundantly pointed out, but you just move the goal-posts and demand "modern" theoretical opponents. Well, in the sense that "modern" = "supported by the latest evidence," you're quite correct. There are no "modern" theoretical alternatives to common descent involving natural selection (which is the meat of Darwin's theory and what I'm taking to be what you mean by "Darwin-type bio-evolutionary theory"). But that's not common descent's fault.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that Darwin-type bio-evolutionary theory has no (scientific) theoretical opponents. None. Never has had. remainder of repeated OP snipped
Vexer, since you're just repeating your OP verbatim (which means you either learned nothing or heard nothing you wanted to listen to) and no one is interested in another three pages of you not listening or learning, this thread is closed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.