Dims Posted April 9, 2008 Posted April 9, 2008 Does the existence of nanobacteria is established? Do their role in some deseases already proved? Thanks.
Phi for All Posted April 9, 2008 Posted April 9, 2008 They're definitely real but whether thay are what their discoverers say they are is still in question. Here is a fairly recent study (2007).
CharonY Posted April 15, 2008 Posted April 15, 2008 Afaik there is almost nothing definite about them. Just to give an example I checked the same journal as the link above (PloS Path.) and found this: Link From the abstract: "Our results definitively ruled out the existence of “nanobacteria” as living organisms and pointed out the paradoxical role of fetuin (an anti-mineralization protein) in the formation of these self-propagating mineral complexes which we propose to call “nanons.” The presence of fetuin within renal calculi was also evidenced, suggesting its role as a hydroxyapatite nucleating factor." Well, OK according to these authors they are definitely not living. I have not checked into this topic seriously, though. I would be interested to look at some samples under the AFM myself, though. The report is quite convincing, btw.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now