Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm assuming you're familiar with integration, but just not how to do this specific problem.

 

Firstly if you can picture the graphs it will help:

graph-1.jpg

 

You need to work out the points where the two graphs intercept. That will give you the upper and lower bounds. Set: y=ln[x]=x-2 and solve for x. But err, I can't see how to solve that myself.

 

ln[x] = x-2

eln[x] = x = ex-2 = exe-2

xe-x = e-2

but then what?

 

if I use my calculator to do it for me then I get: x=0.1586 ; x=3.146.

 

Then you want to integrate for one function, and then subtract the integral of the other. So you start off with the entire area under the higher graph (the ln[x] one) and then subtract the area under the lower graph (the x-2 one) to leave just the area between them.

 

[edit] oh, and to integrate ln[x] what you do is the integral, by parts, of 1*ln[x]. So you integrate the 1 and differentiate the ln[x], as per the "by parts" method of integration.

 

[edit2] also you're gonna have to be careful about where the function crosses the y-axis, else you might get 0 area (where "positive" area cancels with "negative" area). Do you know what I mean? Like the integral of (x-2) from 0 to 2 is -2, and the integral from 2 to 3 is 1/2. The total area is 2+½, not ½-2, because area has to be positive - hopefully you know what I mean! So maybe if you do the problem in 2 parts, firstly for the positive y values, and then for negative.

 

[edit3] ok, I did the question and got a correct looking answer. If you want the solution I'll post it, but if you want to do it yourself (it's good practice, seriously!) then use the two intercept points I gave you, because I still can't see how to get them without a calculator, and do what I said in [edit2], treating +y and -y as two seperate areas, because under the y-axis will give you a "negative" area.

Posted
I'm assuming you're familiar with integration, but just not how to do this specific problem.

 

Firstly if you can picture the graphs it will help:

graph-1.jpg

 

You need to work out the points where the two graphs intercept. That will give you the upper and lower bounds. Set: y=ln[x]=x-2 and solve for x. But err, I can't see how to solve that myself.

 

ln[x] = x-2

eln[x] = x = ex-2 = exe-2

xe-x = e-2

but then what?

 

if I use my calculator to do it for me then I get: x=0.1586 ; x=3.146.

 

Then you want to integrate for one function, and then subtract the integral of the other. So you start off with the entire area under the higher graph (the ln[x] one) and then subtract the area under the lower graph (the x-2 one) to leave just the area between them.

I would recommend, instead, subtracting the two functions and integrating ln(x)- (x-2)= ln(x)- x+ 2. That way you don't have to worry about where the functions are positive or negative. Within the limits of integration ln(x)- x+ 2 is always positive.

 

[edit] oh, and to integrate ln[x] what you do is the integral, by parts, of 1*ln[x]. So you integrate the 1 and differentiate the ln[x], as per the "by parts" method of integration.

 

[edit2] also you're gonna have to be careful about where the function crosses the y-axis, else you might get 0 area (where "positive" area cancels with "negative" area). Do you know what I mean? Like the integral of (x-2) from 0 to 2 is -2, and the integral from 2 to 3 is 1/2. The total area is 2+½, not ½-2, because area has to be positive - hopefully you know what I mean! So maybe if you do the problem in 2 parts, firstly for the positive y values, and then for negative.

 

[edit3] ok, I did the question and got a correct looking answer. If you want the solution I'll post it, but if you want to do it yourself (it's good practice, seriously!) then use the two intercept points I gave you, because I still can't see how to get them without a calculator, and do what I said in [edit2], treating +y and -y as two seperate areas, because under the y-axis will give you a "negative" area.

Posted

Not in terms of elementary functions. It might be possible to solve in terms of the "Lambert w-function" which is defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xe^x.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.