Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

was 3 steps below Nikola Tesla.

 

wasn't even on the same playing field as nikola. search him up on youtube. watch some video's you'll be astonished you don't know his name and einstien isn't the forgotten one.

 

He invented a tower that could give us unlimited energy from the sky's ionized layer in the atmosphere. but the project was destroyed by the government while it was being built because it would give limitless free energy for everyone, and they couldn't charge for it. he also built radio waves, lasers, high energy particles, and he stopped progress on his own project because if used you could open a whole in the earths electromagnetic field and allow all the ion's to rush in. creating a lightning storm with the electricity over 100 times greater then any lighting on earth today, with more energy and force then nuclear bombs it would destroy whole citys.

Posted

Anyone with a semi decent physics knowledge is aware of Nikola Tesla, if only because there's a unit named after him, the Tesla...

 

His inventions are not what people make them out to be... It wasn't hushed up it just wouldn't really work.

Posted
Anyone with a semi decent physics knowledge is aware of Nikola Tesla, if only because there's a unit named after him, the Tesla...

 

His inventions are not what people make them out to be... It wasn't hushed up it just wouldn't really work.

 

 

yes it would have. your just in denial. that guy was ahead of even our time right now.

Posted
yes it would have.

 

Perhaps then you can try them for yourself and report back. Upon doing so, I think you'll find that accusations of denial are unnecessary, and may even apply in the other direction.

Posted

A note on the Atomic Weapons. Although, all he did was inform the president that such a weapon could be built, without knowing that one was possible, they wouldn't have tried to build one so he was directly responsible in that respect.

 

He also didn't fail on unification, he simply didn't have the time to finish it. That's not to say that he didn't fail. He considered his letter to president Truman regarding E=MC^2 is greatest failure after the weapon was deployed. Also note that he was invited to work on the A-bomb, but refused to play any part in masterminding such a weapon.

Posted

This conversation boils down to the fact that:

 

There are two opposing theories about the great advances in science. One, called the “eureka” theory, holds that a truly outstanding individual is occasionally born whose brilliant insights illuminate his generation, and whose contribution alone is the cause of quantum jumps in knowledge. This view is supported by naming many of the great scientists, from Copernicus through Einstein, who produced ideas of such originality and importance that they were light years ahead of their peers. These men seemed, unaided, to have changed the course of history.

 

The opposition theory is sometimes called the “zeitgeist” theory, which in German means the “spirit of the times”. It insists that revolutionary ideas are a product of their generation. This theory proclaims that at certain intervals in history circumstances are ripe for new discoveries and that outstanding individuals merely play their preordained roles in developing them. Those who support this theory claim that through the ages many equally able persons have existed, but that only those fortunate enough to have been born at the propitious moment in time make the momentous discoveries that occur.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.