Guest Invisible Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 Hello everyone. I am new to the forums and on spring break right now. Except I have some homework and want to get it done ASAP to get it over with. I have some questions that I need help getting them answered. Q1: A motorist's radar detector uses an antenna and circuitry that is turned to electromagnetic waves with a wavelength of about 3.0 cm. Why won't the radar be able to detect the red light from a police officer's laser light system? Q2: A picture on the TV screen is crated when electrons shot form the back of the set strike a special coating on the inside of the screen. Why do you think the face plate glass of a TV set contains lead? Q3: Cancer cells are often characterized as cells that are rapidly growing out of control. Why would these cells be particularly vulnerable to gamma rays from a source like radioactive cobalt 60 as a treatment for cancer? If anyone can help me that's be really great, and I'd really appreciate it!
YT2095 Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 1. 3cm`s is in the microwave band, the red laser is in the optical band and at a considerably higher frequency 2. it contains lead to block any stray X-Rays emmited by the cathode in the electron gun 3. no idea, biology isn`t my area, sorry.
aommaster Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 Well, this is what I have learnt: -Alpha particles: No good, cause they are stopped by the skin. They do not reach the cancerous cells -Beta particles: No good as they are not strong enough and, sometimes get stopped by the body. -Gamma rays: Perfect. Even though most of them go through the body, the ones that DO hit causes damage. Take a look at the digram below:
Lance Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 Don’t gamma rays mess the DNA up when it’s copied? So wouldn’t it have more of an effect if the cells were copying them selves faster? Just a guess.
aommaster Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 Well, this is what happens. 1.Evil gamma ray comes along and hits DNA 2.This damages the DNA beyond repair. 3.There is a trigger in cells that tells them 'start reproducing' and 'Stop reproducing'. The one that says 'Stop reproducing' gets damages. 4.When the cell starts to reproduce, it can't stop. We now have cancer. As you can see, the gamma rays are focussed at the point of the tumour, so they are more likely to be destroyed than the other cells. I am not saying that those cells don't get damaged, because they do. And this starts off another cancer. If u r lucky, you would get the cancer destroyed and those cells won't be affected
YT2095 Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 Invisible said in post # :Q3: Cancer cells are often characterized as cells that are rapidly growing out of control. Why would these cells be particularly vulnerable to gamma rays from a source like radioactive cobalt 60 as a treatment for cancer? key word being WHY, as opposed to HOW. it says to me that cancer cells are more suscepible to gamma rays (I don`t know why they are, or even IF they are??) as the pic that AOM posted shows, the little black lines are the input rays, in effect all material gets a dose, but only a limited one, and then the angle is moved and new material gets a dose, but all the time this happens the central axis is the tumor, and that ALWAYS gets a dose! but as far as I know, cancer is not "particulary vulnerable" to any form of radiation, you may consider it the same as any other cell as far as I know?
Lance Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 Well your reproductive organs are much more vulnerable to radiation then your head or parts of your body that don’t reproduce.
YT2095 Posted March 28, 2004 Posted March 28, 2004 Scientificly I don`t know why that is the case, I`ve noticed that during an X-Ray they will use the lead sheilding on your,,, how shall we say? More Intimate Parts I don`t quite know why though, as I already stated, Biology isn`t really my area although I`m sure there`s a good reason for it, I just don`t know what as yet
wolfson Posted March 29, 2004 Posted March 29, 2004 ACHRE Report The functions of living tissue are carried out by molecules, that is, combinations of different types of atoms united by chemical bonds. Some of these molecules can be quite large. The proper functioning of these molecules depends upon their composition and also their structure (shape). Altering chemical bonds may change composition or structure. Ionizing radiation is powerful enough to do this. For example, a typical ionization releases six to seven times the energy needed to break the chemical bond between two carbon atoms.[91] This ability to disrupt chemical bonds means that ionizing radiation focuses its impact in a very small but crucial area, a bit like a karate master focusing energy to break a brick. The same amount of raw energy, distributed more broadly in nonionizing form, would have much less effect. For example, the amount of energy in a lethal dose of ionizing radiation is roughly equal to the amount of thermal energy in a single sip of hot coffee.[92] The crucial difference is that the coffee's energy is broadly distributed in the form of nonionizing heat, while the radiation's energy is concentrated in a form that can ionize. What is DNA? Of all the molecules in the body, the most crucial is DNA (deoxyribose nucleic acid), the fundamental blueprint for all of the body's structures. The DNA blueprint is encoded in each cell as a long sequence of small molecules, linked together into a chain, much like the letters in a telegram. DNA molecules are enormously long chains of atoms wound around proteins and packed into structures called chromosomes within the cell nucleus. When unwound, the DNA in a single human cell would be more than 2 meters long. It normally exists as twenty-three pairs of chromosomes packed within the cell nucleus, which itself has a diameter of only 10 micrometers (0.00001 meter).[93] Only a small part of this DNA needs to be read at any one time to build a specific molecule. Each cell is continually reading various parts of its own DNA as it constructs fresh molecules to perform a variety of tasks. It is worth remembering that the structure of DNA was not solved until 1953, nine years after the beginning of the period studied by the Advisory Committee. We now have a much clearer picture of what happens within a cell than did the scientists of 1944. What effect can ionizing radiation have on DNA? Ionizing radiation, by definition, "ionizes," that is, it pushes an electron out of its orbit around an atomic nucleus, causing the formation of electrical charges on atoms or molecules. If this electron comes from the DNA itself or from a neighboring molecule and directly strikes and disrupts the DNA molecule, the effect is called direct action. This initial ionization takes place very quickly, in about 0.000000000000001 of a second. However, today it is estimated that about two-thirds of the damage caused by x rays is due to indirect action. This occurs when the liberated electron does not directly strike the DNA, but instead strikes an ordinary water molecule. This ionizes the water molecule, eventually producing what is known as a free radical. A free radical reacts very strongly with other molecules as it seeks to restore a stable configuration of electrons. A free radical may drift about up to 10,000,000,000 times longer than the time needed for the initial ionization (this is still a very short time, about 0.00001 of a second), increasing the chance of it disrupting the crucial DNA molecule. This also increases the possibility that other substances could be introduced that would neutralize free radicals before they do damage.[94] Neutrons act quite differently. A fast neutron will bypass orbiting electrons and occasionally crash directly into an atomic nucleus, knocking out large particles such as alpha particles, protons, or larger fragments of the nucleus. The most common collisions are with carbon or oxygen nuclei. The particles created will themselves then set about ionizing nearby electrons. A slow neutron will not have the energy to knock out large particles when it strikes a nucleus. Instead, the neutron and the nucleus will bounce off each other, like billiard balls. In so doing, the neutron will slow down, and the nucleus will gain speed. The most common collision is with a hydrogen nucleus, a proton that can excite or ionize electrons in nearby atoms.[95] What immediate effects can ionizing radiation have on living cells? All of these collisions and ionizations take place very quickly, in less than a second. It takes much longer for the biological effects to become apparent. If the damage is sufficient to kill the cell, the effect may become noticeable in hours or days. Cell "death" can be of two types. First, the cell may no longer perform its function due to internal ionization; this requires a dose to the cell of about 100 gray (10,000 rad). (For a definition of gray and rad, see the section below titled "How Do We Measure the Biological Effects of Radiation?") Second, "reproductive death" (mitotic inhibition) may occur when a cell can no longer reproduce, but still performs its other functions. This requires a dose of 2 gray (200 rad), which will cause reproductive death in half the cells irradiated (hence such a quantity is called a "mean lethal dose.")[96] Today we still lack enough information to choose among the various models proposed to explain cell death in terms of what happens at the level of atoms and molecules inside a cell.[97] If enough crucial cells within the body totally cease to function, the effect is fatal. Death may also result if cell reproduction ceases in parts of the body where cells are continuously being replaced at a high rate (such as the blood cell-forming tissues and the lining of the intestinal tract). A very high dose of 100 gray (10,000 rad) to the entire body causes death within twenty-four to forty-eight hours; a whole-body dose of 2.5 to 5 gray (250 to 500 rad) may produce death within several weeks.[98] At lower or more localized doses, the effect will not be death, but specific symptoms due to the loss of a large number of cells. These effects were once called nonstochastic; they are now called deterministic.[99] A beta burn is an example of a deterministic effect. What long-term effects can radiation have? The effect of the radiation may not be to kill the cell, but to alter its DNA code in a way that leaves the cell alive but with an error in the DNA blueprint. The effect of this mutation will depend on the nature of the error and when it is read. Since this is a random process, such effects are now called stochastic.[100] Two important stochastic effects of radiation are cancer, which results from mutations in nongerm cells (termed somatic cells), and heritable changes, which result from mutations in germ cells (eggs and sperm). How can ionizing radiation cause cancer? Cancer is produced if radiation does not kill the cell but creates an error in the DNA blueprint that contributes to eventual loss of control of cell division, and the cell begins dividing uncontrollably. This effect might not appear for many years. Cancers induced by radiation do not differ from cancers due to other causes, so there is no simple way to measure the rate of cancer due to radiation. During the period studied by the Advisory Committee, great effort was devoted to studies of irradiated animals and exposed groups of people to develop better estimates of the risk of cancer due to radiation. This type of research is complicated by the variety of cancers, which vary in radiosensitivity. For example, bone marrow is more sensitive than skin cells to radiation-induced cancer.[101] Large doses of radiation to large numbers of people are needed in order to cause measurable increases in the number of cancers and thus determine the differences in the sensitivity of different organs to radiation. Because the cancers can occur anytime in the exposed person's lifetime, these studies can take seventy years or more to complete. For example, the largest and scientifically most valuable epidemiologic study of radiation effects has been the ongoing study of the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Other important studies include studies of large groups exposed to radiation as a consequence of their occupation (such as uranium miners) or as a consequence of medical treatment. These types of studies are discussed in greater detail in the section titled Taken from the report.
aommaster Posted March 29, 2004 Posted March 29, 2004 Whoa! I would have been amazed if u said that u typed it out!
swansont Posted April 2, 2004 Posted April 2, 2004 2. it contains lead to block any stray X-Rays emmited by the cathode in the electron gun Also the Bremsstrahlung X-rays you get from the electrons hitting the screen, which are probably the more important source.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now