The Three Principles of Consciousness

[Graviphoton]

The Three Laws of Time Evolution (Expectant, Uncertain and Certainty)

 

The Pathology and Arrangement of Knowledge –

 

I propose there are three main principles, that work differential roles against the flow of time. It highlights possible relations with the uncertainty principle in a whole, and explains why nothing at the subatomic level can be applied to mere cause and effect. In principle, they explain why we have the knowledge we have… the qualia of existence… the fountain of matter and energy, and even the ethereal mixture of consciousness. If we exist in the present time, the only ever real time, then the past, according to both the expectancy and certainty role, combined with uncertainty, says that the past is:

 

1. The past is ruled by certain and UNCERTAIN rules.

 

This means that we can be certain about past events, but we can also be uncertain, as a past event could and does hold incomplete knowledge from time-to-time. During the present, we don’t tend to ‘’expect’’ anything from the past, so it doesn’t play a role.

The rules in the present are all functional:

 

2. We can be certain, UNCERTAIN, and expect outcomes during the present time.

 

Here, we can see that we can be certain of the present, and also be uncertain of it. So many examples could be said to how we could be uncertain during the present time: It might occur very frequent in your life… and we expect more during the present… If mind is time, and time is mind, then we always expect more… a future, this is what we always expect.

Then the future has aligned for it:

 

3. We can be UNCERTAIN about the future and we can be Expectant of it.

 

It seems that axiom no.3 is the only principled axiom that cannot allow any certainty. There, certainty and uncertainty arise side-by-side, and this is caused by Entropy of knowledge, which I called a while back as, ‘’linear knowledge,’’ meaning that knowledge has a linear realization to the human being. It presents itself, and unfolds its memory to us as the arrow of times shows us a directionality to that unfolding. In fact, since there is no arrow representing this, instead of some interpretations of the ‘Psychological Arrow of Time’, I shall call the ‘Informational Arrow of Time,’ to represent the linear nature of human knowledge. It’s more specific.

 

So here we have it. The rules of consciousness has just been displayed out according to the boundaries of living in the present.

 

This can all be linked to the Binding Principle of Neurophysics, since the mind is binding time together with knowledge. The Binding Problem can be answered for though, as I have explained, I think everything is predetermined. Because of this, space and time has a memory. We seem to ‘’seep’’ out of this memory, out of space and time, and it created this thing we call consciousness. No other configuration could perform this work, and has stunning probabilistic arguments for the Anthropic Principle of QM.

 

Nothing?

 

I'll just add, Niels Bohrs principle of complimentarity would be useful in describing these concepts i have brought forth.

[mooeypoo]

Another one!?

 

Geesh.

[Graviphoton]

And? It maybe the subject of consciousness, but in effect they are different subjects on consciousness...

 

... would you rather me straddle along to the physics area, and talk about some other topic on physics?

[mooeypoo]

They're all almost the same, though.

[Graviphoton]

How is it? I've introduced three principles (not to mistake the Uncertain principle for Heisenbergs uncertainty principle) for consciousness and mind. Before, i was talking about it having its own intrinsic degrees of freedom.

[zule]

The Pathology and Arrangement of Knowledge –.

I start well, I don't even understand the title of your three principles:doh:. Why "pathology"? Having consciousness is a illness?

 

 

 

This can all be linked to the Binding Principle of Neurophysics, since the mind is binding time together with knowledge. The Binding Problem can be answered for though, as I have explained, I think everything is predetermined. forth.

 

What does the Binding Principle of Neurophysics state? Do you know who propossed it?

[Graviphoton]

In respect to the binding principle, i stated once in an essay:

 

''How can written text seen by the eyes, contain [almost] the same information as when heard by the ears? How does this information vary and fluctuate? Indeed, the 'binding problem' holds also many questions; the most prominent being, how do we crystallize existence in a continuous flow of perception, rather than discontinuous flashes?''

 

The binding problem, for me to explain it well, is how mental phenomena, arises in such a clean state, and not in a disasembled configuration. Also, it can mean other things, but this is the universal interpretation.

 

And, sorry... i don't know who coined the term.

 

Also... have you never heard of the term of pathology used in science?

 

I stated pathology, simply because it may be bias theory. It may not be though. I think the theory makes a lot of sense, and i am still waiting for people to tackle what i have stated.